Lagunzad-Suarez, Elineth Elizabeth. 4 0
A meta-evaluation of the faculty evaluation system of chartered colleges and universities in the national capital region / 6 6 Elineth Elizabeth Lagunzad-Suarez. - - - xvi, 319 pages 28 cm. - - - - - . - . - 0 . - . - 0 .
Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2006.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration.
5
ABSTRACT: Considering the context that PASUC would like to respond to the significant features and implementing policies of the NBC 461 by addressing the issues and concerns along the faculty evaluation, the writer of this paper conducted a study that aimed to contribute to providing input for future amendments of its implementation. Ambitious as it may seem, this study was conducted to empirically look into some areas that may be explore to promote information dissemination and awareness on the issues and concerns in the implementation of National Budget Circular (NBC) 461. The NBC 461 guidelines have set forth a system of evaluating faculty that have evolved after several revisions through the past decade. In structuring and designing the scheme, it is hoped that highly qualified and competent faculty from the State Universities and Colleges (SUC) will be promoted by upgrading the position item held by the incumbent faculty, instead of looking for scarce vacant position (Pada, 2005). The expressed dissatisfactions over the existing system, comments and observations-good and bad-coming from the students, faculty and administrators about this system motivated this researcher to conduct this study. Hence, the first aim of this paper is to identify, if ever there is, a gap between the existing and desired practices in faculty evaluation using a meta-evaluation instrument and to give recommendations in order to address such gap. The researcher used the Program Evaluations Meta-evaluation instrument organized according to the Joint Committee Program Evaluation Standards (1994) with four standard criteria: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The other existing faculty evaluation procedure/practice to evaluate teaching effectiveness was assessed using an adapted version of the Faculty Perspectives of Teaching Performance Appraisal System (FPTPAS) Instrument developed and validated by De Guzman (1992). Considering the classification of meta-evaluation according to the four basic typologies, this study on Meta-Evaluation of the Faculty Evaluation Program of Selected Chartered Universities in NCR is both a formative and summative evaluation. This is an ex-post-facto (retro-valuation, as it is carried out during the evaluation process or when it is already done), an external (evaluation is done by someone not involved in the assessed evaluation process, being an external control, and both a design and process meta-evaluation. The respondents' perceptions of the existing (What is) faculty evaluation program were assessed and the mean ratings were analyzed to identify whether a significant difference is present among their perspectives. Furthermore, the respondents' desired (What Should be) system/practice was also analysed. Based on the findings of this study, some recommendations for modifications or amendments to the system of faculty evaluation program were proposed.
5
2 = =
2
2 --0------
6 --0-- 2 --------
0 2 --
--20------
--------20--
--------20--
----2
/ 2
/ 2
/
/
A meta-evaluation of the faculty evaluation system of chartered colleges and universities in the national capital region / 6 6 Elineth Elizabeth Lagunzad-Suarez. - - - xvi, 319 pages 28 cm. - - - - - . - . - 0 . - . - 0 .
Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2006.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration.
5
ABSTRACT: Considering the context that PASUC would like to respond to the significant features and implementing policies of the NBC 461 by addressing the issues and concerns along the faculty evaluation, the writer of this paper conducted a study that aimed to contribute to providing input for future amendments of its implementation. Ambitious as it may seem, this study was conducted to empirically look into some areas that may be explore to promote information dissemination and awareness on the issues and concerns in the implementation of National Budget Circular (NBC) 461. The NBC 461 guidelines have set forth a system of evaluating faculty that have evolved after several revisions through the past decade. In structuring and designing the scheme, it is hoped that highly qualified and competent faculty from the State Universities and Colleges (SUC) will be promoted by upgrading the position item held by the incumbent faculty, instead of looking for scarce vacant position (Pada, 2005). The expressed dissatisfactions over the existing system, comments and observations-good and bad-coming from the students, faculty and administrators about this system motivated this researcher to conduct this study. Hence, the first aim of this paper is to identify, if ever there is, a gap between the existing and desired practices in faculty evaluation using a meta-evaluation instrument and to give recommendations in order to address such gap. The researcher used the Program Evaluations Meta-evaluation instrument organized according to the Joint Committee Program Evaluation Standards (1994) with four standard criteria: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The other existing faculty evaluation procedure/practice to evaluate teaching effectiveness was assessed using an adapted version of the Faculty Perspectives of Teaching Performance Appraisal System (FPTPAS) Instrument developed and validated by De Guzman (1992). Considering the classification of meta-evaluation according to the four basic typologies, this study on Meta-Evaluation of the Faculty Evaluation Program of Selected Chartered Universities in NCR is both a formative and summative evaluation. This is an ex-post-facto (retro-valuation, as it is carried out during the evaluation process or when it is already done), an external (evaluation is done by someone not involved in the assessed evaluation process, being an external control, and both a design and process meta-evaluation. The respondents' perceptions of the existing (What is) faculty evaluation program were assessed and the mean ratings were analyzed to identify whether a significant difference is present among their perspectives. Furthermore, the respondents' desired (What Should be) system/practice was also analysed. Based on the findings of this study, some recommendations for modifications or amendments to the system of faculty evaluation program were proposed.
5
2 = =
2
2 --0------
6 --0-- 2 --------
0 2 --
--20------
--------20--
--------20--
----2
/ 2
/ 2
/
/