Normal view MARC view ISBD view

4 0

Automated News : Better than expected? 6 6 - - - - - - - - . - . - 0 . - . - 0 .

ABSTRACT : We conducted two experiments to study people's prior expectations and actual perceptions of automated and human - written news. We found that first, participants expected more from human - written news in terms of readability and quality; but not in terms of credibility. Second, participants' expectations of quality were rarely met. Third, when participant saw only one article, differences in the perception of automated and human--written articles were small. However, when presented with two articles at once, participants preffered human-written news foe readability but automated news foe credibility. These results contest previous claims according to which expectation adjustment explains differences in perceptions of human-written and automated news.





5

















5





ISBN:

ISSN: 2 = =

Standard No.:

Publisher. No.:

Source:

LCCN:

Nat. Bib. No.: 2

Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.:

Subjects--Personal Names:
2 --0------

Subjects--Corporate Names:
6 --0-- 2 --------

Subjects--Meeting Names:

0 2 --

Subjects--Uniform Titles:
--20------

Subjects--Chronological Terms:


Subjects--Topical Terms:
AUTOMATED NEWS ------EXPECTATION-CONFIRMATION --ROBOT JOURNALISM--

Subjects--Geographic Terms:
--------20--

Index Terms--Genre/Form:
----2

LC Class. No.: / 2

Dewey Class. No.: / 2

National Agricultural Library Call No.: /

National Library of Medicine Call No.: /

Gov. Doc. Class. No.: