Advocating women's rights: a comparative analysis of two literacy works / Gagahasin, Erica Cyra; Ocampo, Deyacy; Sy, Ma. Frances Leticia and Tayoto, Krizzia Ann. 6

By: Gagahasin, Erica Cyra et. al. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 201246Edition: Description: 28 cm. 42 ppContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- -- -- 20 -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: Summary: ABSTRACT: This study aimed to comparatively analyse two literary works about women's advocacy. Significantly, it identified how Feminism was presented in Sojourner Trtuh's Aint I a Woman and Hillary Clinton's are Human Rights, this Comparative Analysis illustrated the similarities and differences of Feminism in the two literary works that were written from two different periods. This study was a qualitative research that sought information through interaction with informants who were experts in their field. As a result, the researchers found out that in 1851, when Sojourner's speech was delivered, women deprived of their rights and are considered slaves. On the other hand, Clinton's speech which delivered 144 years after sojourner's speech, it now talks about how modern women learned and are now fighting for their rights. The researchers inferred how Feminism has evolved through time and how until now there are still many women who are not aware of their rights and privileges. Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Thesis: (Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Communication Arts in English)- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2012. 56

5

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to comparatively analyse two literary works about women's advocacy. Significantly, it identified how Feminism was presented in Sojourner Trtuh's Aint I a Woman and Hillary Clinton's are Human Rights, this Comparative Analysis illustrated the similarities and differences of Feminism in the two literary works that were written from two different periods. This study was a qualitative research that sought information through interaction with informants who were experts in their field. As a result, the researchers found out that in 1851, when Sojourner's speech was delivered, women deprived of their rights and are considered slaves. On the other hand, Clinton's speech which delivered 144 years after sojourner's speech, it now talks about how modern women learned and are now fighting for their rights. The researchers inferred how Feminism has evolved through time and how until now there are still many women who are not aware of their rights and privileges.

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.