Customer satisfaction based framework in evaluating the curriculum in industrial psychology / Bernardino C. Ofalia. 6

By: Ofalia, Bernardino C. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 46Edition: Description: 28 cm. viii, 138 pagesContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- -- -- 20 -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: Summary: ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to create and propose a framework in evaluating the curriculum in industrial psychology. Patterned from the Six Sigma, DMAIC model in a achieving total customer satisfaction, this proposed framework aims to aid educational administrators decide empirically which subjects are commendable for inclusion in the revision the psychology curriculum. The outcome would serve as the answer to appeal of the Commission for Higher Education for the change of the (industrial) psychology curriculum in preparation for the licensure examination. Utilizing the quantitative methodology and employing the Descriptive-Cross-sectional design, respondents (customers ) i.e. psychology student/recent graduate of psychology and the curriculum developers were made to answer a researcher-made instrument called the Human Resources Competency Index Indicator (HRC2i). The instrument intends to measure which HR competency the customer perceive to be relevant. Each perceived relevant HR competency is theoretically equated also to be their degree of learning satisfaction. For according to the pragmatic educational philosophy, learning can only be satisfying if the learning is said to be meaningful or relevant. Test for difference was used to determine disparity of perceptions among the group of respondents. Results show that there is a significant difference among the three groups of respondents. This finding can now aid future curriculum developers which subjects should be appropriately included in the final revision of the curriculum through further analysis of individual competencies. Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book PLM
PLM
Graduate School Library
Graduate School-Thesis/Dissert LB 2372.E3 .O33 2011 (Browse shelf) Available G1163
Total holds: 0

Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2011.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration. 56

5

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to create and propose a framework in evaluating the curriculum in industrial psychology. Patterned from the Six Sigma, DMAIC model in a achieving total customer satisfaction, this proposed framework aims to aid educational administrators decide empirically which subjects are commendable for inclusion in the revision the psychology curriculum. The outcome would serve as the answer to appeal of the Commission for Higher Education for the change of the (industrial) psychology curriculum in preparation for the licensure examination. Utilizing the quantitative methodology and employing the Descriptive-Cross-sectional design, respondents (customers ) i.e. psychology student/recent graduate of psychology and the curriculum developers were made to answer a researcher-made instrument called the Human Resources Competency Index Indicator (HRC2i). The instrument intends to measure which HR competency the customer perceive to be relevant. Each perceived relevant HR competency is theoretically equated also to be their degree of learning satisfaction. For according to the pragmatic educational philosophy, learning can only be satisfying if the learning is said to be meaningful or relevant. Test for difference was used to determine disparity of perceptions among the group of respondents. Results show that there is a significant difference among the three groups of respondents. This finding can now aid future curriculum developers which subjects should be appropriately included in the final revision of the curriculum through further analysis of individual competencies.

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.