Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Perceived Factors Affecting Review Preferences of Graduating Nursing Students in PLM for PNLE: A Basis for a Proposed In-House Review / Arao, Karen Grace S.; Schofield, Charlotte Faye A.; Tolentino, Jennifer Rose C.; Torres, Mary Joyce C. and Vizcayno, Kathleen Marie R. C.; Torres. 6

By: Arao, Karen Grace S.; Schofield, Charlotte Faye A.; Tolentino, Jennifer Rose C.; Torres, Mary Joyce C. and Vizcayno, Kathleen Marie R. C.; Torres. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |

Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |

Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; October, 2009.46Edition: Description: 28 cm. vi, 108 pagesContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- -- -- 20 -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:

Contents:

Action note: In: Summary: ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to determine the perceived factors affecting review preferences of the graduating nursing students in PLM for PNLE and this will be a basis for a proposed in-house review. The study was conducted at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila College of Nursing in Intramuros, Manila. The respondents were the senior nursing students of first semester of the school year 2009-2010. Out of the total 203 graduating students, 20% of the population, the researcher used 42 students as respondents. Specifically, the researchers determined the nursing students profile in terms of gender, socioeconomic status, and general weighted average (GWA); and the preferences of the respondents according to review method, mode of review, cost of review classes, qualification of the reviewers, venue for the review, and schedule of reviewing. Then, the significant relationship between the profile and the respondents preferences were tested in order to determine the basis for a proposed in-house review. The descriptive survey research employed design under the purposive sampling technique to arrive on its respondents. A self-made checklist questionnaire was utilized for the survey. The statistical treatments applied were frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean, chi-square distribution and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Findings showed that the senior nursing students preferred the in-house review method. They also preferred affordable and convenient ways to review and the most important factor for them is the quality of education that they will get. Moreover, the following were found to have no significant relationship: as pertaining to the gender, socioeconomic status and general weighted average profile with the preferences of the respondents. Based on the findings, an in-house review program was proposed to be implemented in PLM College of Nursing to help the students pass and review for the PNLE and to improve what the college and the university as a whole can offer to its students. Other editions:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes
Comments ( 0 )

Item type	Current location	Home library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Book	PLM	PLM Health Sciences Library	Health Sciences-Thesis	T Fil. 200 (Browse shelf)	Available		HT.200

Total holds: 0

Undergraduate (Thesis) Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila.;College of Nursing, Bachelor of Science in Nursing. 56

ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to determine the perceived factors affecting review preferences of the graduating nursing students in PLM for PNLE and this will be a basis for a proposed in-house review. The study was conducted at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila College of Nursing in Intramuros, Manila. The respondents were the senior nursing students of first semester of the school year 2009-2010. Out of the total 203 graduating students, 20% of the population, the researcher used 42 students as respondents. Specifically, the researchers determined the nursing students profile in terms of gender, socioeconomic status, and general weighted average (GWA); and the preferences of the respondents according to review method, mode of review, cost of review classes, qualification of the reviewers, venue for the review, and schedule of reviewing. Then, the significant relationship between the profile and the respondents preferences were tested in order to determine the basis for a proposed in-house review. The descriptive survey research employed design under the purposive sampling technique to arrive on its respondents. A self-made checklist questionnaire was utilized for the survey. The statistical treatments applied were frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean, chi-square distribution and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Findings showed that the senior nursing students preferred the in-house review method. They also preferred affordable and convenient ways to review and the most important factor for them is the quality of education that they will get. Moreover, the following were found to have no significant relationship: as pertaining to the gender, socioeconomic status and general weighted average profile with the preferences of the respondents. Based on the findings, an in-house review program was proposed to be implemented in PLM College of Nursing to help the students pass and review for the PNLE and to improve what the college and the university as a whole can offer to its students.

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.