Quality enhancement model for the nursing education program / Remigia A. Nathanielsz. 6

By: Nathanielsz, Remigia A. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 46Edition: Description: 28 cm. xi, 130 pagesContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- -- -- 20 -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: Summary: ABSTRACT: The participation of 1,860 students, faculty and alumni from 31 Level II and Level II accredited nursing education programs provided the data needed for this methodological study. Conducted in the last quarter of 1995, 76 indicators of quality nursing education programs were initially identified and put together in a checklist. The participants responded to this checklist and indicated the degree by which specific items could be an indicator of quality. Each item was rated using a 5-point scale, where 5 means Excellent Indicator, and, 1 means Poor Indicator. Applying relevant statistical processes 9e.g., means, factor analysis, correspondence analysis, chi-square deviations) on the research data, 64 items from the original checklist merited to be included in the final form of the Quality Enhancement Model (QEM). On the basis of the results of the various procedures cited earlier, the QEM was found to be a valid and reliable tool to measure the quality of nursing education programs. Recommendations are made for the wider use and application of the QEM, particularly by the CHED in its efforts to authenticate and ensure the high quality of tertiary education, including nursing education. This can be done and above the usual voluntary non-governmental accreditation system currently practiced in the country. Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book PLM
PLM
Graduate School Library
Graduate School-Thesis/Dissert LB 2372.E3 .N38 1996 (Browse shelf) Available G189
Book PLM
PLM
Graduate School Library
Graduate School-Thesis/Dissert LB 2372.E3 .N38 1996 (Browse shelf) Available G190
Book PLM
PLM
Graduate School Library
Graduate School-Thesis/Dissert LB 2372.E3 .N38 1996 (Browse shelf) Available G191
Total holds: 0

Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1996.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration. 56

5

ABSTRACT: The participation of 1,860 students, faculty and alumni from 31 Level II and Level II accredited nursing education programs provided the data needed for this methodological study. Conducted in the last quarter of 1995, 76 indicators of quality nursing education programs were initially identified and put together in a checklist. The participants responded to this checklist and indicated the degree by which specific items could be an indicator of quality. Each item was rated using a 5-point scale, where 5 means Excellent Indicator, and, 1 means Poor Indicator. Applying relevant statistical processes 9e.g., means, factor analysis, correspondence analysis, chi-square deviations) on the research data, 64 items from the original checklist merited to be included in the final form of the Quality Enhancement Model (QEM). On the basis of the results of the various procedures cited earlier, the QEM was found to be a valid and reliable tool to measure the quality of nursing education programs. Recommendations are made for the wider use and application of the QEM, particularly by the CHED in its efforts to authenticate and ensure the high quality of tertiary education, including nursing education. This can be done and above the usual voluntary non-governmental accreditation system currently practiced in the country.

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.