Philippine policy reforms and infrastructure development :a historical account 6
By: 4 0 16 [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): The Philippine Review of Economics. 54:2 (December 2017). pp. 61-87 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- POLICY REFORMS-PHILIPPINES -- INFRASTUCTURE DEVELOPMENT -- -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:| Item type | Current location | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | PLM | PLM Periodicals Section | Periodicals | HC451.P538r.2017 (Browse shelf) | Available | PER1988H |
Browsing PLM Shelves , Shelving location: Periodicals Section , Collection code: Periodicals Close shelf browser
ABSTRACT : Following the restoration of democratic political institutions in 1986, the Philippine government, under a succession of political administration, has pursued a structural policy reform on several fronts, both economic and non-economic. This paper assesses some policy reforms. Some progress has been achieved under the leadership of the National Economic and development Authority and oversight of the various inter-agency NEDA Board committees, such as the infrastructure, investment coordination. and development budget coordination committees. The enactment of the Build - Operate - Transfer Law, for instance has broadened and deepened the participation of the private sector in the infrastructure program. At this juncture, however, closing the infrastructure gap, particularly in transport, continues to be a formidable challenge. Major improvements, among other concern, in procurement and implementation capacities of implementing government agencies, fair allocation of public-private risk bearing in contracts, and elimination of corruption in the approval process at all levels of government, national and local, are indicated 56
5
5
There are no comments for this item.