Can Grades Be Helpful and Fair? 6

By: 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997.;copyright December 1997/January 1998.46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 Dennis D. Munk and William D. Bursuck 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- Grading system -- -- -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: Educational Leadership 55 (4) : 1997. pp.44-47 Summary: Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book PLM
PLM
Periodicals Section
Periodicals L 11 Ed83el (Browse shelf) Available PER 277 CB
Total holds: 0

Abstract : Although there is not yet much research on the topic, the practice of making exceptions or substitutions for grading criteria is relatively common. In fact, as many as 50 percent of general education teachers use grading adaptations for their students. The most common of these are grading on improvement, giving multiple grades (for example, grading for tests and for effort), and weighting grades for specific assignments. Many teachers, however, believe grading adaptations can be unfair, especially when they are applied to someÄbut not allÄstudents. They say that limiting adaptations discriminates against students who don't meet qualifications for special education and ignores individual differences among students. Students say such limitations can create a disincentive for taking harder classes and provide those who receive adaptations with an unfair advantage. The authors recommend policies for grading to schools interested in fairer systems. 56

5

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.