Professional Development Schools-The Proof Is in Performance 6
By: 4 0 16 [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; copyright February 1998.46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- Teaching Profession -- Professional development schools -- Teacher -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:| Item type | Current location | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | PLM | PLM Periodicals Section | Periodicals | L11.Ed83el.1998 (Browse shelf) | Available | PER 277D |
ABSTRACT : Facing a state mandate, Maryland teacher educators established a pilot Professional Development School (PDS) and conducted research to determine whether the PDS approach would indeed improve the performance of teacher candidates. The researchers found that the PDS approach was more effective than the regular program in preparing teacher candidates to maintain classroom discipline, use technology effectively for instruction, and reflect on their teaching. Additionally, the PDS provided the participating school with professional development, including an on-site course for their provisional teachers, and assistance with school improvement goals through teacher-candidate service projects 56
5
5
There are no comments for this item.