E-Government as a tool to monitor government accountability 6

By: 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): NRCP Research Journal. 16:3 (December 8, 2017). pp 1-8 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 Maria Pilar M. Lorenzo 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY ;GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK;CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION -- TRANSPARENCY;DEMOCRATIZATION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES -- -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: Summary: Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book PLM
PLM
Periodicals Section
Periodicals Q180.P6.N213j.2017 (Browse shelf) Available PER1963A
Total holds: 0

ABSTRACT: In spite of the existing government accountability measures, there are still many gaps in living transparency in the bureaucracy. This paper evaluates a new tool - EGovernment in monitoring government, civil sector. The E-government, as defined by the World Bank (2016), refers to the use by government agencies of information technologies that can transform relations with citizens, business, and other arms of government. The meditation of technology affords an increased dissemination of information and democratization of government services, and reduces costs in terms of time, distance and financial expenses. In this manner the E_Government propounds participation, responsiveness, accountability and thereby, an inclusive national development. The more salient aspects of the study cover the assessment of E-Government practices in the country using the criteria set forth by the United Nations (2001) and by a local matrix suggested by Siar (2005). Lastly , evaluation and reccomendation. 56

5

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.