A Measure of College Student Course Engagement 6

By: 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; July / August 2005.46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 0022-0671 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Related works: 1 40 Mitchell M. Handelsmana, William L. Briggsa, Nora Sullivana & Annette Towlera 6 []Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- Achievement of college students, -- Student Course Engagement Questionnaire -- Student engagement in lower division courses -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:
Contents:
Action note: In: The Journal of Educational research 98 (3) : 2005. pp.184-192 Summary: Other editions:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book PLM
PLM
Periodicals Section
Periodicals L 11 J85 (Browse shelf) Available PER 954 MC
Total holds: 0

ABSTRACT : Student engagement is considered an important predictor of student achievement, but few researchers have attempted to derive a valid and reliable measure of college student engagement in particular courses. In 2 studies, we developed and explored the validity of a measure of student engagement, the Student Course Engagement Questionnaire (SCEQ). Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 dimensions of college student engagement that were distinct and reliable: skills engagement, participation/interaction engagement, emotional engagement, and performance engagement. We reported evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the measure. In particular, we found relationships between factors on the SCEQ and self-report measures of engagement, endorsement of self-theories, goal preferences, and grades. 56

5

5

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

© Copyright 2024 Phoenix Library Management System - Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.