Tao/lipunan, Moral/ Imoral : Macario Pineda at Reinhold Niebuhr. 6
By: 4 0 16 [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): Perspectives in the Arts and Humaniities Asia. 4 (1) : March 2014. pp.27 5 6 [] |
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; Quezon City : School of Humanities, Ateneo de Manila University, c2014 46Edition: Description: Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Subject(s): -- 2 -- 0 -- -- | -- 2 -- 0 -- 6 -- | 2 0 -- | -- -- 20 -- | | -- -- Macario Pineda;Moral Freedom -- Reinhold Niebuhr;Social change -- Philippine Social problem -- | -- -- -- 20 -- --Genre/Form: -- 2 -- Additional physical formats: DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification:| Item type | Current location | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | PLM | PLM Periodicals Section | Periodicals | NX572.A1.As42 (Browse shelf) | Available | PER 1690B |
ABSTRACT Macario Pineda's novels, particularly his 1947 masterpiece Ang Ginto sa Makiling, engage fundamental questions about the moral nature of the human person and the possibility of societal transformation. Though dissimilar in personal background and social milieu from Pineda, Reinhold Niebuhr, social ethicist in twentieth-century American society, raises these same questions in his 1932 classic Moral Man and Immoral Society. Moreover, they similarly base their responses in Christian Faith. Pineda is uncompromising in his belief in the moral capacity of the person, especially when nurtured through education, to do good and thus to establish Makiling, his symbol of the transformed society, in our midst. Though convinced too of the individual moral goodness, Niebuhr is deeply aware of the powerful and corrupt forces at play in modern society, and therefore foresees an unrelenting struggle between individual goodness and society. Both Pineda and Niebuhr's responses offer food for thought at a time when these same questions plague contemporary Philippine society. 56
5
5
There are no comments for this item.