Cayabyab, Arlene G. and Talliedo, Maria Katrina P.  4  0   <br/><br/>
An Enhancement of the Filipino proofing tool /        6 
       6     
Cayabyab, Arlene G. and Talliedo, Maria Katrina P. 
 -   
 -     
 -    28 cm.     
 -   
 -   
 - 
 - 
 -         .
 -     .
 -          0   .
 -         .
 -  0       .
<br/><br/>   Undergraduate Thesis: (BSCS major in Computer Science) - Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2005. 
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>      
<br/><br/>   5 
<br/><br/>      
<br/><br/> ABSTRACT:  	Filipino is the most used language here in the Philippines, both written and verbal. Their study, the Enhancement of the Filipino Proofing Tools greatly focuses in giving the Filipinos an advantage in using the Microsoft Word with the recognition of the said language.  	At first, the proponents chose to have study focusing only with spell checker, through the use of internet we came up with several proposals including the one we chose from the list of topics that needs enhancement, the proponents came up with the nearest idea of enhancing a previous study which is the Filipino Proofing Tools which includes a concept of a spell checker.  	The enhanced Filipino Proofing Tools still features the Filipino Spell Checker, Filipino Thesaurus and Filipino Translator. The proponents also provide a wider list or database of words both in English and Filipino for spell checker, translation as well as for the thesaurus.  	During the creation of the proposals, the proponents consulted the thesis adviser for the approval of possible topics. Fortunately, the study conducted by the previous proponents was the one chosen as the focus study. The current proponents started gathering data through the use of internet and libraries. They also seek the help pf previous proponents for them to have a hard copy of documents as well as the whole system, they were luck enough that the previous proponents were very cooperative.  	The proponents of the study also surpassed interrogations during the term, from the panellists as well as their thesis adviser. They were also required to still implement some enhancement to satisfy the panellists.        .       
<br/><br/>      
<br/><br/><br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> 
<br/><br/><br/>5     
<br/><br/><br/> <br/>   
<br/><br/><label>ISBN: </label>  
<br/><br/><label>ISSN: </label>2 
 =   
 =   
<br/><br/><label>Standard No.: </label>        
<br/><br/><label>Publisher. No.: </label>  
<br/><br/><label>Source: </label>        
<br/><br/><label>LCCN: </label>
<br/><br/><label>Nat. Bib. No.: </label> 2 
<br/><br/><label>Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: </label>    
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Personal Names: </label><br/>     2     --0------
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Corporate Names: </label><br/>     6 --0-- 2 --------
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Meeting Names: </label><br/><br/> 0    2 --
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Uniform Titles: </label><br/>  --20------
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Chronological Terms: </label><br/> 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>    --------20--
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Geographic Terms: </label><br/>--------20--
<br/><br/><label>Index Terms--Genre/Form: </label><br/>----2
<br/><br/><label>LC Class. No.: </label> / 2 
<br/><br/><label>Dewey Class. No.: </label> / 2 
<br/><br/><label>National Agricultural Library Call No.: </label> /  
<br/><br/><label>National Library of Medicine Call No.: </label> /  
<br/><br/><label>Gov. Doc. Class. No.: </label>