Interpersonal values and personality type of high and low academic achievers of sophomore college students / Dorothea M. Cariño. 6
By: Cariño, Dorothea M. 4 0 16 [, ] | [, ] |
Contributor(s): Academic Performance Most of the general weighted average (GWA) of high academic achievers ranges from 1.75 to 1.99. For low academic achievers, most of their GWA ranges from 3.0 to 3.68. 2.2 | Interpersonal Values Majority of the respondents for both high and low academic achievers placed a high value on support, conformity and benevolence; an average value on recognition and independence; and low value on leadership. 2.3
Language: Unknown language code Summary language: Unknown language code Original language: Unknown language code Series: ; 46Edition: Description: 28 cm. xvii, 113 pagesContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: ISSN: 2Other title: 6 []Uniform titles: | | Personality Type Most of the respondents for both high and low academic achievers have Type A personality. 3. Subject(s): Interpersonal values; and 5.2 | Personality type? The descriptive survey method was employed in this study. The respondents were the sophomore college students from the College of Engineering and Technology (CET) at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila (PLM). They were classified as high or low academic achievers depending on their general weighted average (GWA). The different tests utilized were: the Personal Data Sheet, Culture Fair Intelligence Tests, Survey of Interpersonal Values and Self-Awareness and Personality Type Questionnaire. After careful analysis of the data, the following findings were obtained: 1 | Socio-demographic Profile of the respondents 1.1 | -- Age Majority of the respondents for both high and low academic achievers are 18 years old 1.2 | | -- Religion The predominant religion that comprises the total number of the respondents for both the high and low academic achievers is Catholic. 1.4 | -- Ordinal Position For high academic achievers, most of the respondents were the firstborn in their family while for low academic achievers; most of the respondents were the middleborns in their family. 1.5 | Educational Attainment of Parents Majority of the parents of the respondents for both high and low achievers attained the collegiate level of education. 1.6Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: 5DDC classification: | LOC classification: | | 2Other classification: Gender; 1.3| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | 20 | |||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| Available | ||||||||
| 2 | Available |
Thesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1998.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences, and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in Psychology. 56
5
ABSTRACT: This research attempted to find out and compare the interpersonal values and personality type of high and low academic achievers of sophomore college students. Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions: 1.
What is the socio-demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: 1.1
Age; 1.2
Gender; 1.3
Religion; 1.4
Ordinal position; 1.5
Educational attainment of parents a)
Mother b)
Mental Ability? 2.
What is the profile of the respondents in terms of: 2.1
Academic performance; 2.2
Interpersonal values; and 2.3
Is there a significant relationship between the mental ability and academic performance of respondents when grouped according to: 3.1
High academic achievers; and 3.2
Low academic achievers? 4.
Are there significant differences between the high and low academic achievers in terms of: 4.1
Interpersonal values; and 4.2
Personality type? 5.
Is there a significant relationship between the selected socio-demographic profile of high and low academic achievers in terms of: 5.1
There are no comments for this item.