by Montibon, Milagros S. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] | | | The findings of the study led to the following conclusions on the relative effectiveness of the JIGSAW II model and the traditional method in teaching Business Calculus: 1 | Learning took place when JIGSAW II model was used in teaching Business Calculus. This further guarantees that JIGSAW II model is an effective tool in teaching Business Calculus. 2.

by Lugtu, Vincent E. 4 0 16, [, ] | [, ] | | | The responses which the respondents provided by completing the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey revealed that the SWAT Police of Manila generally manifest an above average level of Restraint and Ascendance have been observed among the respondents. For Restraints, the general mean score of the respondents is 18.41, which is interpreted as above average, while the general mean score for Ascendance is 19.97, which is also interpreted as above average. Correspondingly, the SWAT Police of Manila generally manifest an average level Sociability and Emotional Stability traits. The general mean score for Sociability trait 21.75 interpreted as average level. For Emotional Stability trait, the general mean score of the respondents is 18.79, thus fall under the average level. Accordingly, the respondents have an above average level of Objectivity, having the general mean score of 20.25. Similarly, the respondents manifest an above average level of friendliness, having the general mean score of 16.88. With Thoughtfulness trait, the general mean score of the respondents is 19.11 which appear to be in the average level. Personal Relations trait appears to be high among the Police respondents. They gathered a general mean of 18.08 which fall under the above average level. Lastly, with Masculinity trait, the respondents obtain a general mean score of 21.07 which is interpreted as average level. 4 | There was no significant difference on the measured Adversity Quotient® scores of the respondents when grouped according to age, birth order, family size, socio-economic status, job rank, and length of service. The t-value and F-ratio, together with the p-value were computed and tallied to support the findings. Also, there was no significant difference on several of the measured Personality-Temperament Traits scores of the respondents when grouped according to age, birth order, family size, socio-economic status, job rank, and length of service. However, several of the Traits were found to have significant difference on particular demographic profile. Mean scores of the respondents in terms of Ascendance trait was significantly different grouped according to age, socio-economic status, and length of service. Mean score for Sociability trait was significantly different when grouped according to birth order. Emotional stability score was significantly different grouped according to family size. Friendliness trait mean score was significantly different when grouped according to job rank. And lastly, mean scores for Thoughtfulness trait was significant grouped according to birth order. The t-value and F-ratio, together with the p-value were computed and tallied to support the findings. 5.