000			04197nam a2200277Ia 4500
001			92593
003			ft8454
005			20251028141250.0
008			250424n 000 0 eng d
040			_erda
041			_aengtag
050			_aHG3691 A46 2023
082			_a.
100			_aChristian S. Almirol, Nathaniel D. Arizala, Franchezca Pauline B. Biasca, Regina Satingin, Mary Joyce C. Lozano, Andrea B. Sarmiento
245		0	_aInfluence of credit risk indicators on the financial performance of Philippine Universal Banks: Basis for improving financial decisions
264			_aManila: _bPLM, _cc2023
300			_bUndergraduate Thesis: (BSBA major in Financial Management) - Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2023
336			_btext _atext _2rdacontent
337			_bunmediated _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_bvolume _avolume _2rdacarrier
505			_aABSTRACT Universal banks contribute significantly to economic growth worldwide. Banks provide savings, deposits, investments, credit, and loans to consumers, corporations, and the government as trusted intermediaries. However, it is also a source of the most significant risk in banks worldwide, the credit risk. This study aims to determine the correlation of credit risk indicators on the financial performance of universal banks in the Philippines. Credit risk indicators include the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non-Performing Loans Ratio (NPLR), and Loan Loss Provision. In contrast, financial performance indicators include Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). The study analyzes financial data from the 16 Philippine universal banks from 2018 to 2021 and formulates hypotheses relating to the subject matter. This study employed descriptive statistics and inferential statistics to analyze the data. The findings revealed that ROA has no significant relationship with CAR, NPLR, or LLP. However, the correlation coefficients of ROA and CAR showed a negative and weak relationship, while ROA and its relationship to NPLR and LLP are positive and weak. The test results also revealed that ROE has no significant relationship with the three credit risk indicators. However, ROE and CAR exhibited negative and weak correlations, whereas ROE and its relationship to NPLR and LLP had positive and weak correlations. KEYWORDS: Credit Risk Indicators, Financial Performance, Universal Banks, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Non-performing Loans Ratio, Loan Loss Provision, Return on Asset, Return on Equity
520			_aABSTRACT Universal banks contribute significantly to economic growth worldwide. Banks provide savings, deposits, investments, credit, and loans to consumers, corporations, and the government as trusted intermediaries. However, it is also a source of the most significant risk in banks worldwide, the credit risk. This study aims to determine the correlation of credit risk indicators on the financial performance of universal banks in the Philippines. Credit risk indicators include the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non-Performing Loans Ratio (NPLR), and Loan Loss Provision. In contrast, financial performance indicators include Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). The study analyzes financial data from the 16 Philippine universal banks from 2018 to 2021 and formulates hypotheses relating to the subject matter. This study employed descriptive statistics and inferential statistics to analyze the data. The findings revealed that ROA has no significant relationship with CAR, NPLR, or LLP. However, the correlation coefficients of ROA and CAR showed a negative and weak relationship, while ROA and its relationship to NPLR and LLP are positive and weak. The test results also revealed that ROE has no significant relationship with the three credit risk indicators. However, ROE and CAR exhibited negative and weak correlations, whereas ROE and its relationship to NPLR and LLP had positive and weak correlations. KEYWORDS: Credit Risk Indicators, Financial Performance, Universal Banks, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Non-performing Loans Ratio, Loan Loss Provision, Return on Asset, Return on Equity
526			_aF
655			_aacademic writing
942			_alcc _cMS _01 _2ddc
999			_c24100 _d24100