000			08112nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			05947ntm a2200205 i 4500
001			73717
003			0
005			20250920173659.0
008			180905n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aMarcelo, Felix Martin E. and Marron, Kyla S. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aFactors affecting the attrition rate of B.S. Mathematics students in Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila / _d _b _n _cMarcelo, Felix Martin E. and Marron, Kyla S. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c201046
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _a46 pp _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aUndergraduate Thesis ( BS Mathematics) - Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila. 2010. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: The main thrust of this study focuses on determining the factors that affect the attrition rate of B.S. Mathematics students in Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following questions. 1. What is the profile of student attrition from 2004-2009? 2. What are the profiles of the respondents in terms of the following: a. Gender b. Age? 3. What is the profile of the means of the respondents survey in terms of the following factors: a. Student b. Teacher c. Structure of educational experience d. Culture of the discipline? 4. Is there a significant difference between the general means of the factors that contribute to student attrition? The hypothesis of this study was formulated based on the theories and principles acquired about the respondents. 1. There is no significant difference between the general means of the factors that contribute to student attrition. To answer the above questions, dismissed students of Bachelor of Science in Mathematics in Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila from 2004-2009 were used in this study. Answers of students on the questionnaire were the main data for this study. Descriptive method of research was utilized to assess the profile of the respondents in this study. Several statistical treatments were used using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS), these are the frequency, sum, mean, standard deviation and variance, One - way Analysis of Variance. After analysing and interpreting the data, the researchers came up with the following findings: 1. From 2004-2009, the number of students enrolled was 171, out of those students, 45 was dismissed, failed or dropped out, buy only 32 respondents were able to respond to the survey. 2. Majority of the dismissed students were female having a total of 18 out of 32. Most of the respondents were 18 years old, while 12 were 17 years old and the rest were 16 years of age. 3. Students agreed that academic problem ranks first among the student factors that contribute to attrition rate with a mean of 3.31. Next is, disliking the program B.S. Math having a mean of 3.09. Respondents cited that their perceptions of math did not match their experience as a student with a mean of 2.91. Membership in barkadas and personal and financial reasons were also mentioned as a factor nut not having much mean which is 1.72 and 1.5 respectively. Likewise, involvement in many extracurricular and health problem indicates that students were not really affected by them with a mean of 1.41 and 1.31 correspondingly. Students strongly agreed that giving too long examinations was a big reason why they failed the course with a mean of 3.66. It was supported by factors such as covering too broad lessons, lecturing too fast, lack of remedial teaching and big classes having the means of 3.47, 3.41, 2.97 and 5.23 respectively. However, other factors such as poor student-teacher relationship and not correcting and returning test papers were last among the reasons why they were dismissed in the program with a mean of 2.41 and 2.25 corresponding and having a general mean of 2.96. Respondents showed that somehow they have a perception of not staying in the program and they were less academically prepared in high school having the same mean - 2.75. Although these students were dismissed in the program, they mentioned that they were not misled in choosing the course. Upon leaving B.S. Math, most of them didn't talk to anybody which has a mean of 2.06. Lastly, they also cited that they were not emotionally prepared with a mean of 1.75. In terms of practices of the faculty students agreed that they were provided enough academic support and assisted on career counselling with a means of 3.09 and 2.56 respectively. Respondents also cited that they were influenced to study the program having a mean of 2.53. However students cited that they were unaware of the work load involved in studying B.S. Math as well as they felt that lack of assistance was given during their schooling, having a means of 2.44 and 2.41 respectively and having a general means of 2.62. Based on the results of the findings of this study the researchers came up with the following recommendations. Two sets of recommendation were formulated. One set was based on the data, information, findings and conclusions of this investigation. They could be of interest to decision makers in the Philippine Educational System. The other set of recommendations based on some other aspects that were not considered in this study for interested researchers. There are many implications for the future that include future research, action to be taken by staff, faculty and administration. And there are surely new educational practices that will take root as a result of this study. These recommendations attempt to identify strategies that can be chartered and executed and bring about change program (B.S. Mathematics), within the college, and throughout the university. In addition, studiesv that will be conducted from school year 2009 onwards can use this research as a guide. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c25256 _d25256