| 000 | 04973nam a2201225Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 000 | 02849ntm a2200205 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | 90130 | ||
| 003 | 0 | ||
| 005 | 20250920173819.0 | ||
| 008 | 240427n 000 0 eng d | ||
| 010 |
_z _z _o _a _b |
||
| 015 |
_22 _a |
||
| 016 |
_2 _2 _a _z |
||
| 020 |
_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x |
||
| 022 |
_y _y _l _a2 |
||
| 024 |
_2 _2 _d _c _a _q |
||
| 028 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 029 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 032 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 035 |
_a _a _b _z _c _q |
||
| 037 |
_n _n _c _a _b |
||
| 040 |
_e _erda _a _d _b _c |
||
| 041 |
_e _e _a _b _g _h _r |
||
| 043 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 045 |
_b _b _a |
||
| 050 |
_a _a _d _b2 _c0 |
||
| 051 |
_c _c _a _b |
||
| 055 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 060 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 070 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 072 |
_2 _2 _d _a _x |
||
| 082 |
_a _a _d _b2 _c |
||
| 084 |
_2 _2 _a |
||
| 086 |
_2 _2 _a |
||
| 090 |
_a _a _m _b _q |
||
| 092 |
_f _f _a _b |
||
| 096 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 097 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 100 |
_e _e _aIsmil, Lemuel John, Pinauin, Amiel Joaquin, Solano, Patricia Mae. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16 |
||
| 110 |
_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k |
||
| 111 |
_a _a _d _b _n _c |
||
| 130 |
_s _s _a _p _f _l _k |
||
| 210 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 222 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 240 |
_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k |
||
| 245 | 0 |
_a _aFaculty evaluation and qualification analysis system using naive bayes algorithm / _d _b _n _cIsmil, Lemuel John, Pinauin, Amiel Joaquin, Solano, Patricia Mae. _h6 _p |
|
| 246 |
_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p |
||
| 249 |
_i _i _a |
||
| 250 |
_6 _6 _a _b |
||
| 260 |
_e _e _a _b _f _c _g |
||
| 264 |
_3 _3 _a _d _b _cJanuary 2024.46 |
||
| 300 |
_e _e _c28 cm. _aix, 117 pp. _b |
||
| 310 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 321 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 336 |
_b _atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 340 |
_2 _20 _g _n |
||
| 344 |
_2 _2 _a0 _b |
||
| 347 |
_2 _2 _a0 |
||
| 362 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 385 |
_m _m _a2 |
||
| 410 |
_t _t _b _a _v |
||
| 440 |
_p _p _a _x _v |
||
| 490 |
_a _a _x _v |
||
| 500 |
_a _aUndergraduate Thesis (BS Information Technology) - Pamantsan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, c2024. _d _b _c56 |
||
| 504 |
_a _a _x |
||
| 505 |
_a _a _b _t _g _r |
||
| 506 |
_a _a5 |
||
| 510 |
_a _a _x |
||
| 520 |
_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: |
||
| 521 | _aEducational Institutions continue to seek excellence in their hiring practices given the vast spectrum of applicants ready to pursue a profession. Considering the degree to which student achievement is impacted by teacher effectiveness, this is significant. This prime perception makes it clear that there is an increasing requirement to investigate and comprehend how we may enhance the hiring procedure at educational institutions. | ||
| 525 | _aChoosing the most qualified applicants to join the teaching profession is crucial. The fast-evolving digital world has presented significant challenges for the conventional methods of evaluating faculty applications. The traditional means of assessing applicants qualifications-resumes and interviews, for example-have grown laborious and time-consuming. This raises the possibility of missing out on highly qualified candiates or accepting those who might not be the best fit for the educational duty. | ||
| 530 | _aIn this study, the researchers developed a system that utilizes the Naïve Bayes Algorithm to predict which of the applicants has a resume that qualifies as faculty in a few top private universities in the Philippines namely Centro Escolar University (CEU) and De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde. This will significantly apply analytics in faculty hiring decision-making and help hasten the traditional process used by Human Resource Departments when determining whether or not applicants meet the requirements for open positions inside their institution, the list of qualified applicants will be integrated into the system with filtering and sorting feature to help the Human Resource Department of the educational institution locate applicants in particular categories or fields of specialization where they intend to hire. | ||
| 533 |
_eUtilizing the ISO 25010 evaluation, the web-based system shows excellent Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Usability, and Reliability, with respective means of 3.41, 3.26, 3.42, and 2.42. _u |
||
| 536 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 550 |
_a _c _a5 |
||
| 561 |
_g _f |
||
| 580 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 592 |
_a _5 _k _c _a _b |
||
| 600 |
_b _a _b |
||
| 648 |
_2 _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y |
||
| 650 |
_x _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y |
||
| 651 |
_x _a _d _n2 _c0 _v |
||
| 653 |
_a _x _a _d _p20 _v |
||
| 655 |
_0 _2 _a |
||
| 700 |
_i _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v |
||
| 710 |
_b _x _a _y20 _v _z |
||
| 730 |
_s _0 _a _y2 _z |
||
| 740 |
_e _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6 |
||
| 753 |
_c _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a |
||
| 767 |
_t _a _d _b _n _t _c |
||
| 770 |
_t _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k |
||
| 773 |
_a _e _a _d _b _n _c6 |
||
| 774 |
_t _c _a |
||
| 775 |
_t _t _w |
||
| 776 |
_s _t _w _x |
||
| 780 |
_x _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p |
||
| 787 |
_x _t _w _x |
||
| 800 |
_a _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w |
||
| 810 |
_a _x _a _g _t _w |
||
| 830 |
_x _t _w _a _x |
||
| 942 |
_a _x _d _g _i _t _w |
||
| 999 |
_c25780 _d25780 |
||