000 08403nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 06239ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 78825
003 0
005 20250920174229.0
008 190809n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aAgnes, Cherrylene S.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aWork preference as a determinant of socio-psychological behavior through intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of personnel in human resource /
_d
_b
_n
_cCherrylene S. Agnes.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiii, 98 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.)-- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2016.;A thesis presented to the faculty of College of Science-- Graduate Programs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in Psychology major in Clinical Psychology.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: In this study a cross-sectional study (also known as a cross-sectional analysis, transversal study or prevalence study) is a type of observational study that involves the analysis of data collected from a population, or a representative subset, at one specific point in time was used in this study. Specifically, it will answer the following questions: 1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of age, gender, civil status and job level classification? 2. What is the Level of Work Preference of the respondents when grouped according to their demographic profile? 3. Is there a significant difference between the socio-psychological behavior (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) and intrinsic motivation subscale (enjoyment and challenge) and the extrinsic subscale (outward and compensation) when grouped according to their demographic profile? 4. Is there a significant relationship between the Level of Work Preference of the respondents and their demographic profile? The findings of the study are as follows: 1. There are 100 respondents, Male (21%) and Female (79%), 40 years old and below (92%) and 41 years old and above (8%), single (73%), married (27%), Rank and File status (44%), Supervisory level (39%) and Managerial post (17%). 2. The overall mean score of work preference by gender, age group, civil status and job levels shows average on the primary scale extrinsic and intrinsic. It was a little higher extrinsic (3.03) than intrinsic (2.73). The secondary scale enjoyment, challenge, outward and compensation was on average level. Enjoyment (3.24) scored higher, next is the Outward (2.76) followed by Compensation (2.68) and lastly the Challenge (2.61). 3. Data shows that there is no significant difference in the work preference of human resource personnel socio-psychological behavior (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) and intrinsic motivation subscale (enjoyment) and extrinsic motivation subscale (outward and compensation) when grouped into their demographic profile (gender, age group, civil status and job level). There is only on-Challenge of HR personnel when grouped according to job level shows significant differences on work preference. 4. Data shows that there is a no significant relationship in the work preference of personnel in human resource socio-psychological behavior primary scale and secondary scale when grouped according to their demographic profile. The findings of the study led to the following conclusions: 1. Work Preference primary scale Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation and secondary scale and the demographic profile of the personnel in the Human Resource were average in their work preference primary scale and secondary scale. 2. There is no significant difference in the work preference in human resource socio-psychological behavior (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) and intrinsic motivation subscale (enjoyment and challenge) and the extrinsic motivation subscale (outward and compensation) when grouped according to their demographic profile. 3. There is no significant relationship in the work preference of personnel in human resource socio-psychological behavior primary scale and secondary scale when grouped according to their demographic profile. Based on the findings and conclusions the following recommendations are offered: 1. HR personnel by job level (rank and file, supervisor and manager) preferred a work that is challenging to them. These indicate that HR personnel when grouped to job level have significant difference between the socio-psychological behavior and work motivation -CHALLENGE. HR personnel in the supervisory level prefer work that is more challenging to them than HR personnel in the rank and file and manager. But this does not mean that managers and rank and file HR personnel are not challenged, this would recommend that personnel in the rank and file and managers should not be contented on what they already have, they should challenge themselves more to do better or greater than they are right now. These would also serve as a recommendation for the employer to make a more challenging work that would benefit all employees not only to HR personnel. A work that is more challenging but also beneficial. 2. Several implications can be drawn from the findings. The use of longitudinal data could help to answer more complex issues regarding Human Resource work preference and to assess the changes in employees' motivations that might take place over time. 3. That future researcher conducts a same study and includes other employees in different fields. Future studies on work preferences should be carried out in a broader context: in relation to reward satisfaction, psychosocial factors at work, organizational commitment and HR employee/s in different department intent to continue working. 4. That a work preference as a determinant of socio-psychological behavior through intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of personnel in human resource maybe patterned to another study and another self-inventory questionnaire, a questionnaire that is applicable to the Filipino setting and a questionnaire that is more reliable and valid and will also focus on the different aspects.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27394
_d27394