000 06715nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04545ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 70840
003 0
005 20250920174233.0
008 180130n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aOrmita, Luzelle Anne G-L.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aThe development and validation of a career achievement scale for young adults (CASYA) /
_d
_b
_n
_cLuzelle Anne G-L Ormita.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axvi, 98 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2003.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Psychology.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The primary purpose of this study was to develop and validate a Career Achievement Scale for Young Adults. Specifically, the researcher determined if the Career Achievement Scale for Young Adults is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring young adults' need for success in their chosen profession. Likewise, differences in the career achievement of the respondents were also determined to serve as a basis for the standardization of the scale in the future. The Demographic Data Sheet, the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS), and the Career Achievement Scale for Young Adults were the instruments utilized in gathering the important data for this study. All of the data obtained were statistically treated using the Statistical Procedures and Social Solutions (SPSS) Version 10.0. As for the findings of this study, the Career Achievement Scale for Young Adults has content validity and face validity that were established during the first two steps in the process of developing the scale. The scale also has construct validity, which was established by using the contrasted group method and by correlating the career achievement dimensions with one another and with the total scale. However, the concurrent validity of the CASYA was not established. Furthermore, the CASYA is a reliable instrument in general, but two of its dimensions, namely, failures at work and success at work did not yield high reliability coefficients compared to other dimensions of the scale. Finally, there are significant differences in the career achievement of the respondent with regard to occupation, but not with age, gender and civil status. There is a significant difference in the career achievement of administrative, executive, and managerial workers, and the service workers. The former had higher need for career achievement than the latter. On the basis of the results of the study, the researcher recommends that the concurrent validity of the CASYA have to be established in order for the scale to completely possess all the four types of validity that an instrument should have. Furthermore, the CASYA in general is a reliable instrument. However, since the failure and success dimensions did not yield high reliability coefficients as the other dimensions did, efforts should be exerted to improve on the alpha values of these two dimensions. A local translation of the CASYA could be constructed for the use of workers who are not adept with the English language and its standardization and its standardization may be done nationwide to establish norms as well as to make the test suitable to workers even in the regional areas. Considering that this study found significant differences in the need for career achievement of administrative, executive and managerial workers, and service workers, the CASYA in its standardization process, should be administered to a more proportioned number of workers that adequately represent each of the occupational groups, as stated in the 1997 Philippine Standard Occupational Classification. Lastly, the CASYA may be administered to another age group, such as the middle-aged workers and those workers who are not college graduates so that they may also utilize the scale. After the CASYA has been standardized in the future, researchers can utilize it in their respective research endeavors and thus help gather data which may be used to continually update its norms, as well as to accumulate information regarding the effectiveness of the CASYA as a tool used side by side with Human Resource activities such as training, employee counseling, and recruitment.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27420
_d27420