000 06387nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04283ntm a2200229 i 4500
001 90521
003 0
005 20250920174306.0
008 240627n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aValones, Irene D.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aCase management program in the trial courts :
_d
_ban approach to reduce the backlog of criminal cases /
_n
_cIrene D. Valones.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_aManila.
_d
_b
_c202146
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiii, 563 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (Ph.D.)-- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2021.;A dissertation paper presented to the School of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Public Administration.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The Administration of Justice is an elusive quest as reflected in the present backlog and delays in the trials courts' disposition of cases which have been an organizational and administrative problem of the judiciary. Whie several interventions have been made by the Supreme Court in the three projects: Judicial Affidavit Rule, Continuous Trial, and the Court Decongestion, it is theorized by the researcher that there is a need to institutionalize a multi-partnership among the pillars of the criminal justice system to foster technology-driven judiciary. This dissertation examined the response of the courthouse actors: clerks of courts, judges, and public prosecutors, in their assessment on the extent of implementation and effectiveness of he three projects in reducing the backlog of criminal cases. The researcher utilized a descriptive and analytic research design to describe and find the relationship among variables using t-test, Analysis of Variance, Post-hoc Test, and Pearson's Moment Correlation. To determine the current state of the projects implemented in the trial courts in the Philippines, online survey questionnaires were distributed to courthouse actors. The researcher generated primary data, qualitative and quantitative, to describe, compare, and correlate data using statistical analysis; and secondary data from books, journals, published materials, and official internet websites to supplement the primary data gathered in the documentary analysis. The dissertation revealed that while Continuous Trial is effective in reducing the backlog of all types of criminal cases, there are still factors that contribute to the backlog of criminal cases. The researcher proved the significant differences in assessing the extent of implementation of the three projects based on the respondents' profile, significant differences in assessment as to effectiveness, and significant relationship between the extent of implementation and the effectiveness of the projects in reducing the backlog of criminal cases. The policy intervention proposed by the researcher in reducing the backlog of criminal cases in the trial courts is the adoption by the Justice Sector Coordinating Council of a Joint Memorandum Circular designed to enhance and synergize project implementation and effectiveness to reduce the backlog of criminal cases. The Supreme Court should adopt and implement the proposed policy program on the Electronic Case Management Program, an approach to differentiated case management, shared criminal justice data, and case-flow management projects. The Supreme Court shall collaborate with the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) to institutionalize the multi-partnership of the pillars of the criminal justice system as an answer to the elusive quest for the efficient and effective administration of justice. Keywords: backlog, criminal cases, decongestion, trial courts, case management, technology, electronic case management, differentiated case management, shared criminal justice data, case flow management, Judicial Affidavit Rule, Continuous Trial Court, Court Decongestion Project, Justice Sector Coordinating Council, Supreme Court, judicial reforms, public trust, administration of justice, technology-driven judiciary.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27634
_d27634