000			09204nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			07062ntm a2200205 i 4500
001			73346
003			0
005			20250920174308.0
008			180825n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aGarcia, Naomi S. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aOrganizational structure and performance of the Polytechnic University of the Philippines : _d _ba critical analysis / _n _cNaomi S. Garcia. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axvi, 159 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D.)-- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1992.;A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences, Education and Nursing in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: The study attempted to assess the organizational structure of the Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PUP) in the light of its philosophy, institutional goals and its level of performance as a social system and as an economic system. Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: (1) What is the perception of the respondents about the effectiveness of the PUP organizational structure in meeting the needs of the institution in terms of: 1.1 mission, goals, and objectives 1.2 academic programs 1.3 co-curricular activities (2) How did the respondents perceive the university's level of organizational performance as a social system and as an economic system in the areas of: 2.1 organizational management 2.2 organizational climate 2.3 physical resources 2.4 services 2.5 financial services 2.6 support system, internal control, and maintenance of facilities (3) Is there any significant difference in perception of respondents about the university's organizational structure, and its performance as a social environment and as an economic system? Null Hypothesis: 1. There is no significant difference in the perceptions of respondents: 1.1 administrators 1.2 faculty members 1.3 students 1.4 graduates Of the university's organizational structure. 2. There is no significant difference in the perception of respondents about PUP's level of organizational performance as a social system and as an economic system. PROCEDURE: This investigation utilized a Likert-type questionnaire checklist composed of questions in statement form on PUP's organizational structure and its social and economic environments. The 2,926 participants in this study consisted of 3 vice presidents, 11 deans and directors, 25 chairpersons, 10 chiefs of offices, 166 faculty members and 2,511 fourth year students and 200 graduates. TREATMENT OF DATA To interpret the data on the perceptions of the respondents the weighted mean was computed to serve as basis for determining the rankings. To find the relationship between the perceptions of the four groups of respondents, the chi-square was computed. The obtained chi-square was tested against the x2 table at .05 level of significance. This served as the basis for accepting or rejecting the hypotheses. To further determine the agreement or concordance between the perceptions of the four groups of respondents, Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) formula was applied. FINDINGS: 1. The university as a social system is functional as such with the different subsystems interacting with one another I achieving its mission, goals, and objectives. 2. As an organization, the university as a whole is well-structured as authority and responsibility are clearly delineated. 3. Mutual respect and cooperation in various activities is evident. 4. Duties and functions are clearly defined to prevent work overlaps and role ambiguities. 5. The mission, goals and objectives of the university are relevant to the national goals. 6. Practicum and field experiences are part of the curriculum. Curricula and all program of studies are approved by the University Academic Council. 7. Goals and objectives of the university are reflected in the co-curricular program and activities. 8. Students are recognized for outstanding achievements trough various forms of rewards. 9. The university site and campus are free from safety hazards. 10. Buildings are structurally safe and structured for school purposes. 11. Medical, dental and canteen services need further improvements to meet the growing student population. 12. There is fair evidence that the facilities are properly maintained. CONCLUSIONS: 1. PUP is a well-structured organization, but there still a need for realigning hierarchical levels and work units. 2. There is apparent strong work motivation in faculty and other university personnel. 3. PUP as an institution has well-defined goals and objectives which are congruent and complimentary to the national goals. 4. There is relevance in the curricular offerings to the demands of the time such as in its various areas of specialization offered. 5. Co-curricular activities are not only functional but are also responsive to university goals and objectives. 6. Teamwork and cooperation in the social environment of PUP as a result of organizational management contribute to effective and efficient operations. 7. Friendly interaction, high degree of confidence and mutual interest pervade the social environment of PUP. 8. School site is well-planned with provisions for expansion and with enough space to accommodate students for outdoor activities. 9. Reasonable tuition fees are being charged and various forms of financial assistance are being given to deserving students. 10. Medical, dental and canteen services still have to be improved. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Further refine its organizational structure towards making it more dynamic and responsive to the changing needs of the environment. 2. Promote greater teamwork and cooperation among all members of the academic community. 3. Continually assess academic programs to ensure its relevance to the changing needs of students. 4. Continue to provide scholarships, grants and other forms of financial assistance to poor but deserving students. 5. Improve further its services, specifically in the following areas: medical, dental and canteen services. 6. Undertake further research that would enrich and confirm the findings of this study such as: (a) Correlation of PUP's organizational structure to the external productivity of the university; (b) Comparative study between PUP's performance and those of other state universities; (c) PUP's institutional development and its contribution to national development (d) Correlation of the administrative leadership styles of PUP's administrators to organizational effectiveness; (e) Organizational climate of PUP as compared with private learning institutions. 7. Provide the University Administration results of this study to serve as a guide in future planning. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c27652 _d27652