000 10603nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 08438ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 70600
003 0
005 20250920174316.0
008 180119n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aAlvis, Jocelyn C.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aPerceived leadership style and competencies of school principals in relation to perceived teacher's competencies /
_d
_b
_n
_cJocelyn C. Alvis.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axii, 87 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2002.;A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in School Principalship.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The leadership style of the principal is to nurture, develop and reinforce leadership whenever it is found to further the shared purpose of the school. Leadership of principals does not just happen. It is a planned process of interaction in a social setting wherein goals that are mutually satisfying to the school organization and the individuals in the school are established, and means are developed to achieve them. Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions: 1. What are the demographic profile of school principals in terms of: a) age b) gender c) civil status d) educational qualification e) years in service 2. What is the perceived leadership style of the Principals when grouped according to: a) Autocratic b) Democratic c) Laissez-faire 3. What are the perceived competencies of the elementary and high school principals when grouped according to: a) responsibility b) authority c) delegation of authority 4. What are the perceived competencies of teachers of frequency tally when grouped according to: a) Elementary b) High School 5. Is there significant relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and perceived competencies of teachers? 6. Is there significant relationship between perceived competencies of principals and perceived competencies of teachers? To answer the aforementioned questions, the following null hypotheses were tested at 5% el of significance: 1. There is no significant relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and competencies of teachers. 2. There is no significant relationship between perceived competencies of principals and competencies of teachers. Using the descriptive and survey methods of research, the study was participated by 13 principals and 238 teachers representing twenty percent (20%) of the total teacher's population of the Division. The data collected were based on the questionnaires regarding leadership style for principals, RAD Index Scale, and competencies of teachers. The results obtained were tested, compared, analyzed and interpreted utilizing the following statistical tools: weighted means and chi-square test. FINDINGS 1. The demographic profile of the school principals shows that: majority belong to the range from 50-59 years; many are female; some hold either doctorate or master's degree; with 5 to 24 years in service and mostly are married. 2. The data gathered revealed that all the thirteen principals involved in the study are practicing democratic leadership style. 3. The perceived competencies of the elementary and high school principals showed that 53.85 percent considered competencies in authority and 30.77 percent in delegation of authority: and 15.38 percent marked of responsibility. 4. In the elementary school 9.85 percent got outstanding rating and 90.16 percent got very satisfactory rating. In the high school nobody got outstanding rating in competencies, 93.97 percent got very satisfactory and 6.03 percent got satisfactory rating. The elementary school teacher-respondents got better competency rating than their counterpart in the high school. 5. At 5% level of significance, there is no significant relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and perceived competencies of teachers it signifies that the null hypothesis is accepted. 6. Since the obtained value of chi-square test is less than the required value, the obtained value is not significant at 5% level of significance. This means there is no significant relationship between perceived competencies of principals and perceived competencies of teachers and therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. CONCLUSIONS In the light of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. The perceived leadership style of principals in this study is democratic. Under the democratic leadership style, leaders share power and authority with the members of the group. They decentralize decision-making so members are able to participate. Members are consulted and are encouraged expressing their positions and making recommendations. It permits the development of followers and helps them realize their own potential. In this kind of leadership, implementation could be faster because leaders and followers make decisions together and they can jointly determine courses of action. The general trend today is toward wider used of participatory management practice because they are consistent with the supportive and collegial models of modern organization. 2. The perceived competencies of the elementary and high school principals rely on authority in the performance of their functions in school administration and supervision and on the related duties as school managers, followed by delegation of authority and finally by responsibility. 3. The perceived competencies of the teachers based on the performance rating reveals that elementary school- teacher-respondents got better competency rating than the high school teacher-respondents. This implies that elementary school teacher-respondents are more competent than high school teachers in this particular study. 4. The following null hypotheses were accepted at the .05 level of significance: 4.1 There is no significant relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and perceived competencies of teachers. 4.2 There is no significant relationship between perceived competencies of principals and perceived competencies of teachers. 5. The perceived competencies of the elementary and high school principals showed that 53.85 percent considered competencies in authority and 30.77 percent in delegation of authority; and 15.38 percent marked of responsibility. In the elementary school 9.85 percent got outstanding rating and 90.16 percent got very satisfactory rating. In the high school nobody got outstanding rating in competencies, 93.97 percent got very satisfactory and 6.03 percent got satisfactory rating. The elementary school teacher-respondents got better competency ratings than their counterpart in the high school. 6. At 5% level of significance, there is no significant relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and perceived competencies of teachers it signifies that the null hypothesis is accepted. 7. Since the obtained value of chi-square test is less than the required value, the obtained value is not significant at 5% level of significance. This means there is no significant relationship between the perceived competencies of principals and perceived competencies of teachers and therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are set forth: 1. To improve the performance of teachers, the use of democratic leadership style, which is found to be effective in enhancing the competencies of teachers, is recommended. 2. School principals need to attempt to discover both their strengths/ weaknesses, which could become effective basis of improving their competencies. 3. School principals should be given the opportunity to attend regional and national in-service training for them to cope up with administrative changes. 4. School principals must equip themselves with management capabilities and leadership style that would be responsive to the changing need of time. 5. Similar studies maybe conducted in other school divisions to compare results with this study.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27702
_d27702