000			08233nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			06070ntm a2200205 i 4500
001			70602
003			0
005			20250920174316.0
008			180119n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aBaldicanas, Agustin P. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aA proposed enrichment program on the implementation of livelihood education of Makabayan / _d _b _n _cAgustin P. Baldicanas. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axvi, 145 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2009.;A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in School Principalship. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: This descriptive research was undertaken to identify the perception on the implementation of livelihood education of Makabayan and proposed an enrichment program. This study was focused on the perception of the respondents on the status of the implementation of livelihood education of Makabayan in the Division of City School of Manila in the three districts namely Districts IV, V, and VI. Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the Livelihood Education Teachers in terms of: a. Official Designation b. Highest Educational attainment c. Number of Years in Teaching? 2. What are the perceptions of the respondents on the status of the implementation of Livelihood Education under Makabayan in terms of: a. Curricular Content b. Instructional Practices c. Physical Facilities & Equipment? 3. What are the problems encountered by the respondents on the implementation of Livelihood Education of Makabayan in terms of: a. Curricular Content b. Instructional Practices c. Physical Facilities & Equipment? 4. What are the perceptions of the respondents on the Administrative Support in consideration to and in compliance with the implementation of Livelihood Education of Makabayan in terms of: a. Curricular Content b. Instructional Practices c. Physical Facilities & Equipment? 5. What program could be proposed to enrich the implementation of the Livelihood Education of Makabayan? Assumptions Based on the foregoing problem, the following assumptions were raised for consideration. 1. The respondents have different perception on the Status of Implementation, Problems Encountered, and Administrative Support of Livelihood of Makabayan in terms of Curricular Content, Instructional Practices and Physical Facilities and Equipment. 2. The respondents answered the questionnaire honestly and intelligently. 3. There are corresponding solutions that can be recommended by the L. E. Teachers to address such concerns. The respondents perceived that the status of the implementation of Livelihood Education of Makabayan in terms of Curricular Content were very satisfactory with a grand weighted mean of 3.93 while in the Instructional Practices the grand weighted mean was 3.96 with a verbal rating of very satisfactory. In the Physical Facilities & Equipment, the respondents perceived it as satisfactory with a grand weighted mean of 3.20. Specifically, the study showed that in the Curricular Content the respondents indicated that the number 2 indicator which is Topics are related to human experiences, problems and issues got the highest rank followed by number 1 which is the Topic contribute to the attainment of conceptual, process, skills, and affective objective. The study further manifested that in terms of Instructional Practices, Integrating values in all learning areas got the highest rank while sharing the teaching strategies through team teaching got the lowest rank. In the Physical Facilities & Equipment, the respondents indicated that the availability of the training ground/ room for shopwork got the highest rank while the availability of textbook got the lowest rank. The above result gathered further buttressed the position of the participant of the Focus Group Discussion which as one participant put in the inadequacy of the basic tectbook made the program quite impossible to attain. On the problems encountered, the respondents perceived that the problems encountered in the implementation of Livelihood Education of Makabayan is the time allotment which got the highest rank with a grand weighted mean of 3.51. It supported to the general perception among the members of the FGD which they that it was the time factor that is the most pressing problem. The respondents also showed that in terms of Instructional Practices the lack of knowledge about the ICT got the highest rank with a weighted mean of 2.67 while the failure to motivate the pupils was the least of their problem. The respondents also indicated that in terms of Physical Facilities & Equipment the inadequate supply of textbook got the highest rank with a weighted mean 3.70 while the insufficient supply of chairs and tables were the least of their problem. On the extent on the Administrative Support, the respondents indicated that in terms of Curricular Content both the massive information drive on the implementation and the seminars conducted for the proper application of concepts and methodologies of the new curriculum got the highest rank with a weighted mean of 3.67. In terms of Instructional Practices the respondents manifested that the conduct of in service trainings among teachers got the highest rank with a weighted mean of 4.06 and conducting intra visitation got the lowest rank with a weighted mean of 3.74. In the Physical Facilities & Equipment the research showed that the administrators provided financial support for school demonstration which got the highest rank with a weighted mean of 3.39 and supply of computer diskettes, CD, VCD, DVD player for ICT got the lowest rank with a weighted mean of 2.37. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c27703 _d27703