000			10809nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			08650ntm a2200205 i 4500
001			70711
003			0
005			20250920174318.0
008			180122n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aVasquez, Concepcion L. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aThe relationship between job satisfaction and teaching performance among master teachers in the Division of City Schools, Manila / _d _b _n _cConcepcion L. Vasquez. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axv, 86 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2001.;A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in School Principalship. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: This study was conducted to find the relationship between job satisfaction and teaching performance among master teachers in districts V and VI elementary schools in Manila. Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions. 1. What is the demographic profile of the master teachers as to: a. age b. gender c. civil status d. educational attainment e. teaching experience 2. What is the job satisfaction level of the master respondents in terms of: a. maintenance factors b. motivation factors 3. What is the teaching performance level of the master teacher respondents when grouped according to: a. Pupil Development b. Staff Development c. Curriculum Development d. Research Development 4. Is there a significant relationship that exists between respondent's demographic profile and each of the following variables: a. Teaching performance b. Job satisfaction 5. Is there a significant relationship that exists between job satisfaction and the teaching performance of master teacher respondents? The study was conducted in 12 selected public elementary schools in District V and VI in the Division of City Schools, Manila for the school year 2000-2001. Schools involved in the study were; M. Roxas de Ayala, Silahis ng Katarungan, Celedonio Salvador, Justo Lukban, Rafael Palma, F. Ma. Guerrero, Fernando Amorsolo, Bagong Barangay, Bacood, Pio del Pilar, Sta. Ana and Padre Zamora. A questionnaire checklist of the Likert type was used by the researcher to gather necessary information. Part I elicits information on the personal indices of the respondents such as age, sex, civil status, educational attainment, teaching experience, subjects taught and position. Part II consists of Master Teacher's duties and responsibilities as enumerated in the Revised STEP-Past SY 1999-2000. Part III deals with the perceived level of job satisfaction of the master teacher respondents, The following statistical techniques and formulas were employed: Percentage: This was used as descriptive statistics to denote proportion contributed by a past in a whole. Ranking. It was used to describe the positional importance of item or objects discussed. Weighted Mean. Since the responses were given weight based on the 5-point Likert Scale. Chi-Square. This was used determine how the respondents differ in their perception of how teaching performance and job satisfaction when grouped according to age, gender, civil status, educational attainment, and teaching experience. Summary of Findings: Based on the results of the study, the findings were as follows: 1. a. 47 or 46.80% of the respondents belonged to ages 51-55 b. 98 or 96.08% were female c. 69 or 67.65% were married d. 92 or 90.20% revealed that the respondents have acquired the academic requirement in M.A to qualify for their position e. 80 or 78.43% of the respondents have been teaching in the public elementary school for 30 and above years in service 2. As to a. Maintenance factors Sense of belonging with the group received the highest rating with a mean of 4.436. Provision for fringe benefits the sick leave, service credits; scholarship, etc. Received the lowest mean of 3.392. b. Motivation factors Respect of peers and colleagues received the highest mean of 4.353. Involvement in the decision making of the school got a weighted mean of 4.010. 3. The teaching performance level of the master teachers teacher respondents when grouped according to: Pupil Development 4.151 Staff Development 4.207 Curriculum Development 4.03 Research Development 4.051 Grand Weighted mean 4.110 4. On the significant relationship that respondent's demographic profile and of teaching performance and job satisfaction: a. teaching performance Chi Square Interpretation Age 3.673 Not Significant Gender 7.419 Significant Civil Status 9.509 Significant Educational attainment 4.055 Not Significant Teaching Experience 5.722 Not Significant b. Job Satisfaction Chi Square Interpretation Age 3.677 Not Significant Gender 4.687 Not Significant Civil Status 4.797 Not Significant Education attainment 13.705 Significant Teaching Experience 8.239 Not Significant 5. On the relationship between job satisfaction and teaching performance of master teacher respondents. There is no significant relationship between level of master teachers performance and level of job satisfaction since the computed value of X2 is equal to 7.362 which is lower than the tabular value of x2 which is 9.488. CONCLUSION In the light of the foregoing findings, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. The demographic profile of master teacher respondents revealed that majority of them belonged to ages 51 - 55. Thus their sense of belongingness ranked no. 1 because they have worked and stayed long in the school, witnessing their co-teachers developed their own closeness in interpersonal relationship with one another have been established. 2. The teaching performance level of master teachers in terms of maintenance and motivation factors have earned them the respect of their colleagues which ranked number 1 in the survey. Thus, feeling of fulfillment inspire the master teachers to dedicate themselves in their work. They consider themselves as partners in molding the youths. 3. Master teachers consider staff development as an area for teachers training and enhancement of their leadership potentials. 4. Gender and civil status has significant relationship to teaching performance. However we can not conclude that only married teachers can teach effectively, because our teachers undergo training's and attend conferences for teaching and seminars for upgrading their teaching competencies. 5. There is no significant relationship between the level of teaching performance and job satisfaction among master teachers are already seasoned teachers and trained in the area of responsibilities, they may devote themselves in their work but not necessarily happy because the salary does not compensate their heavy responsibilities like supervising problem teachers. RECOMMENDATIONS In view of the findings and conclusions of this study, the following recommendations are offered: 1. Is is strongly recommended that school principals should take steps to promulgate and consistently implement policies, program for master teachers gearing towards excellent job performance. If the school principals observed that master teachers can effectively lead teachers and supervise them to teach effectively, an endorsement should be given. 2. Equal opportunities should be extended to master teachers should they qualify for administrative position. 3. Master teachers should be given added workshop activities in order to enhance their creative talents and leadership styles. In this way, they can use their knowledge and skills for the improvement of instruction and to assist the teachers. 4. Enhancing further the knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies, master teachers in the areas of curriculum and pupil development through seminar workshops for quality education among students. 5. Master teachers should be given intensive training on research. 6. In the light of these findings, the following topics are suggested for further investigation: 6.1 A comparative study of the performance of master teachers I and II in another locale. 6.2 A comparative study of the pupil achievement of master teachers and regular classroom teachers. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c27713 _d27713