000 06487nam a2201237Ia 4500
000 04476ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 59997
003 0
005 20250920174318.0
008 150902n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aCarlos-Tria, Ma. Felma.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aReality television as perceived by media practitioners and mass communication students :
_d
_bbasis for proposed professional guidelines /
_n
_cMa. Felma Carlos-Tria.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiii, 95 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2004.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Communication Management.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: This research explored the perceptions of media practitioners and Mass Communication students on ethical guidelines and selected factors considered in the Reality TV technique used in investigative reporting and the respondents' similarities and/or differences in perceptions therein. The objective of which was to come up with proposed professional guidelines based on the weaknesses in the aspects presented. The samples included 100 media practitioners from different fields of the media and 110 third year college students from the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila. The descriptive research method was employed. Data were collected using the survey-questionnaire derived from the Philippine Journalists Code of Ethics, Social Responsibility Theory, and The Declarations of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists. Supplemental interviews with selected media practitioners were also conducted. Results showed that: •
521 _aMedia practitioners gave the highest rating to SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY and the lowest score to INTEGRITY as regards the investigative programs' extent of adherence to ethical guidelines. •
525 _aThe Mass Communication students gave the highest rating to SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY and the lowest score to INTEGRITY as regards the investigative programs extent of adherence to ethical guidelines. •
530 _aThe media practitioners attributed the highest degree of importance to METHODOLOGY and the lowest to CONCEPTUALIZATION as regards the selected factors considered in investigative reporting. •
533 _eThe Mass Communication students attributed the highest degree of importance to ACCEPTABILITY and the lowest to ISSUES and PROBLEMS as regards the selected factors considered in investigative reporting. •
536 _aIn ethical guidelines, there is significant difference in the perceptions of the respondents as regards ACCEPTABILITY and ISSUES and PROBLEMS. •
538 _aBased on the findings, the researcher came up with this approach: PROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE REALITY TV TECHNIQUE 1.
540 _cProducers must first notify the subjects of the nature and content of the investigative report done about them prior to the story's broadcast, to give the subjects chance to explain their side or justify footage obtained by the program through undercover tactics. 2.
542 _gFollowing the previous statement, public interest should be qualified as benefiting the common good, and an individual's isolated case should not be generalized as to being experienced by many. 4.
546 _aPersons accused of crime should be portrayed innocent until proven guilty. 5.
550 _aJournalists should not delegate it upon themselves to harass suspects, solve crime, or pass judgment on the innocence or guilt of their subjects. 6.
555 _aThey should always separate journalistic inquiry from criminal investigative inquiry. 7.
580 _aComplaints must be assessed and dealt with swift response and action. If the network finds that the objection has bearing, public apology must be given with commensurate degree of influence enforced in the initial broadcast that ruined the subject's reputation in the first place.
_u
583 _5
_a
_b
591 _a
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
600 _b
_c
_a5
611 _a
_g
_f
630 _x
_a
_b
655 _0
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
710 _b
_a
_b
753 _c
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
767 _t
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
770 _t
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
773 _a
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
774 _t
_2
_a
775 _t
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
776 _s
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
785 _t
_0
_a
_y2
_z
787 _x
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
800 _a
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
810 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
830 _x
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
942 _a
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
999 _c27717
_d27717