000 06553nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04394ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 69933
003 0
005 20250920174326.0
008 171229n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aRomero, Jimmy M.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aThe comparative effects of the authority teaching and cooperative learning in the remedial teaching program in basic Mathematics /
_d
_b
_n
_cJimmy M. Romero.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiii, 158 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2002.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Mathematics Education.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: Combining the descriptive and experimental methods of research, which utilized a purposive sampling, this study attempted to examine the comparative effects of the authority teaching and the cooperative learning in the remedial teaching program in Basic Mathematics during the second semester of the school year 2001-2002. Also, it was called for a teaching experiment to propose a remedial teaching program employing an innovative cooperative learning strategy. This study was participated by 58 non-mathematics and non-science freshmen at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila-College of Education in basis of their grades obtained in MTH 010 during the first semester. Pairing or matching of the respondents' final grades was done to constitute either the control group (authority teaching) or the experimental group (cooperative learning). Each group had 29 respondents. The results were tested, analyzed, compared, and interpreted utilizing the following statistical tools: arithmetic means, standard deviations, and two-tailed t-test. In the light of the findings, these showed that both groups had gained the necessary understanding and computational skills in MTH 010. Thus, learning took place after employing to such instructional strategies- the authority teaching and cooperative learning. However, as revealed by the achievement posttest, the experimental group that was taught under the proposed remedial teaching program utilizing an innovative cooperative learning strategy performed well than those who were taught under the traditional authority remedial teaching. Hence, the cooperative learning of the proposed remedial teaching program can be taught more effectively than authority teaching. Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are set forth particularly for the PLM-CED: 1. Since the cooperative learning is found to be an effective strategy to enhance learning, it should be used as an alternative approach in teaching basic mathematics particularly remedial classes. 2. The cooperative learning activities could be incorporated in the mathematics syllabus or in other discipline, so that teachers could be able to facilitate more effectively and to ensure students active participation in the teaching-learning process. 3. The cooperative learning strategy could be made as a remedy to diagnose students' mathematical deficiencies, which could help develop the students' computational skills. However, the teacher should be a master of this strategy to be able to draw highly satisfactory results after remediation. 4. A seminar-workshop should be conducted to pre-service and in-service teachers so that they could know how to use this strategy in their own classroom activity. 5. A parallel study should be considered in wider perspectives or in other areas of specialization to determine the generality of findings across students as well as teachers. 6. Mathematics Curriculum of Teacher-Education Institutions should have an intensive remedial teaching program. 7. To facilitate teaching and learning process that bridges the gap and remedies mathematical deficiencies and difficulties, a remedial teaching program is proposed. 8. Once the proposed remedial teaching program has been implemented for the coming school year, evaluation should follow to further improve or enhance it to meet the needs of the present time.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27767
_d27767