000 06412nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04263ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 69448
003 0
005 20250920174331.0
008 171122n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aPilones, Melchor F.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aReinforced paper beam using recyclable materials /
_d
_b
_n
_cMelchor F. Pilones.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiv, 176 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2003.;A directed study presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering (MEng) with specialization in Structural Engineering.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT With the growing population and ever increasing demand of housing more timber, steel, and concrete will be wasted unless we start re-thinking of our design and construction standards is residential structures. Structural design of single storey units was observed to be safe due to the minimum design requirements. Economy in design is given up when minimum requirements. Govern in the analysis. Re-using paper and tin with the proper combination to form as a composite material proved to be a very good alternative instead of timber in flooring systems. Tests show that common newspapers displayed a very similar tensile strength with tanguile while cartolinas and paperboards has greater capacities. Newspaper attained a tensile strength of 9.618MPa to 13.05MPa while tanguile had a tensile strength of 11.02MPa. Yield strength of used tin from 239.15MPa to 362MPa which was close to the yield strength of steel. Just like reinforced concrete, the proper reinforcement of paper tin showed a very much better material in comparison to actual test of coco lumber. The composite material which was termed as RPB or Reinforced Paper Beam has demonstrated a very good quality in terms of its flexural strength. A comparative theoretical analysis of tanguile and actual experimentation on similar sizes of the composite material also proved that there is indeed a very good chance that RFB will outlast timber. A ½x3x12 reinforced illustration board has a tested flexural strength capacity of 92,756.53N-mm whereas tanguile of the same size has a strength capacity of 20,982.76 N-mm. RPB was very ductile and its formability was far better than timber. Also, its ability to resist fire was another plus factor of the RPB as it was able to withstand which timber can't do over a given period of time. The study showed that the reinforced pasteboard was more effective than reinforced newspaper or reinforced cartolina because less compaction was needed for pasteboard. The cost of fabrication of the RPB was much more affordable as compared to tanguile. A 3'x4' RPB flooring model cost P458,60 as against P536.00 for tanguile flooring. The much improved version can be develop if the machine will do the compression and compaction of the RPB just like plywoods and laminated timber was manufactured. The machine production will minimize the cost of RPB to a much lower value. Considering RPB as a composite material, there are actually as many possible combination to form it into a construction material and this will open the next researchers in the field of engineering new ideas to improve the design concept like using the RPB for ceilings, roofings, wallings and other interior finishes like cabinets and tabletops, to doors and windows, to chairs and bed, etc. reinforced paper beam using recyclable materials proved that there is a bright future I waste products like paper and tin. The figure shown in the next page displays the load capacity of coco lumber and RPB using three-point test method patterned in accordance with the procedures of ASTM designation: D1037-96a. Coco lumber had a load capacity of 103N (pink line) whereas RPB had a maximum load capacity of 384N (light blue). The finished flooring system also shown in the next page was not only structurally sound but aesthetically attractive.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c27801
_d27801