000			09528nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			07390ntm a2200205 i 4500
001			69510
003			0
005			20250920174332.0
008			171129n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aCervantes, Arnel K. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aConstruction delivery system for military projects of the Philippine Army / _d _b _n _cArnel K. Cervantes. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axiii, 98 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2003.;A directed study presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering Management (MEM) with specialization in Construction Management. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: The study was undertaken to describe and evaluate the construction delivery system of the Philippine Army (Army) and 51st Engineer Brigade (51EBde). The specific problems were: 1. What is the status of the construction delivery systems of 51EBde and Philippine Army for the last three and a half years along the following parameters: rate of completion; mode of implementation; and accomplishment? 2. What are the factors that impede the construction operation of the Army from the viewpoints of 51EBde, as Project Administrator and implementor, and the Office of the Army Chief of Engineers (OACE), as planner ad technical supervisor of all Army engineer operations? 3. Is there a significant difference between the implementation of projects by administration and by contract as seen by 51EBde (as doer) and OACE (as planner), respectively? 4. What can be done to enhance further the construction delivery system of the Philippine Army? The researcher used a descriptive method of research. Basing on the data acquired from OACE, it described and evaluated the status of the construction delivery system of the Philippine Army and 51EBde. To determine the factors that impede the construction operation of the Philippine Army, a questionnaire was used. The respondents were military officers with engineering specialization from the Office of the Chief of Engineers and 51st Engineer Brigade of the Philippine Army. The respondents assigned in the Office of the Army Chief of Engineers (OACE) had been designated already as company commanders. It is a position where military engineer officers act as site superintendent and therefore responsible for the physical construction of the infrastructure projects. Ninety-percent of these officers had been assigned as battalion staff officers where military officers assist the battalion commander, in the latter's capacity as project manager in the performance of the latter's job. The respondents from OACE have not been designated yet as battalion commanders or project managers, while 35% of Group B or respondents from 51EBde had been or currently designated as such. On the educational background, not all respondents had the preparation related to construction industry. The major findings of the study are: 1. On the status of construction delivery system along the parameters of rate of completion, mode of implementation, and accomplishments, the findings are as follows: 1.1) On the rate of completion of project, 51EBde's performance was better in Civic Action and Civic Works Project than in Military Projects compared to the performance of the Army. Generally, both units has a completion rate of barely more than 50%, 50.59% for the Army, while 54.94% for 51EBde. 1.2) On the mode of implementation, the Philippine Army and 51EBde overwhelmingly favored the construction by-administration than by-contract. 1.3) On the accomplishments, the 51EBde contributed significantly to the total performance of the Philippine Army. It performed more than 50% of the total accomplishment of the Army. 2. There were three (3) types of factors that impede the construction delivery of the Army and 51EBde, namely: internal and external factors, the Philippine Army manuals and other SOP's regarding project implementation, and the constraints in project implementation regardless of the mode of implementation. 2.1) The respondents identified both internal and external factors that impede the construction delivery system of the Army as well as 51EBde. 2.2) The manuals, SOP's and other guidelines that govern the construction system of the Army were not sufficient to achieve the construction objective of the Army and 51EBde. 2.3) Irrespective of the mode of implementation, the respondents further identified additional factors that impede their operations. 3. The two modes of implementation were significantly different from each other as perceived by the respondents from OACE and 51EBde. Based on the findings, the following conclusions were derived: 1. On the status of the construction delivery system: 1.1) The MP's are the most difficult project category to implement as manifested by the low rate of completion of 51EBde as well as the whole Army. 1.2) The Army favors the by-administration mode of implementation of projects based on its inherent convenience and not on what the government rules and regulations prescribe. 1.3) 51EBde contributes significantly to the development effort of the Philippine Army. 2. On the factors that impede the construction operations of the Philippine Army, the following conclusions are made: 2.1) The construction delivery system of the Philippine Army, with respect to the modes of implementation, is affected by 18 factors which are related to: design, project fund, government requirement, role of end-users, contract administration, control measures, quality management, technical capability of inspection/ monitoring team, and external pressures. 2.2) The manuals, SOP's and other guidelines regarding construction delivery system are found to be inadequate to guide the implementers in achieving the construction objectives. 2.3) Irrespective of mode of implementation, fund support, quality of commanders and political pressure stand out as leading constraints. The technical expertise and aptitude of commanders, weather condition, management of resources, role of construction players; and unfavorable weather condition are added to those identified factors with respect to mode of implementation. 3. Further it is concluded that there is a significant difference between perceptions of OACE and 51EBde about the two modes of implementation. This could lead to a gap between objectives set by OACE (as planner) and actual performance of 51EBde (as an implementing unit). The researcher recommends the formulation and strict implementation of a comprehensive project management manual for the Philippine Army that will address the issue raised in this study. Also, it is recommended that prospective battalion commanders should undergo a Construction Project Management Course or training in order to fully appreciate the essential elements of construction project management. Further, it is recommended that AFP Manual 4-5 be upgraded or improved by invoking the provisions of the proposed comprehensive project management manual for Military Projects. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c27806 _d27806