000 08619nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 06524ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 83221
003 0
005 20250920175035.0
008 210706n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aLopez, Maria Luisa H.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aIntellectual preparedness of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig nursing students in the Philippine Nurse Licensure Examination /
_d
_b
_n
_cMaria Luisa H. Lopez
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c3883846
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axvii, 163 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2006;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Health Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Nursing
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The research attempted to measure the intellectual preparedness of 51 students of a new school of nursing in the Philippine Nurse Licensure Examination. The respondents level of intellectual preparedness in the eleven (11) key areas of nursing responsibilities, namely: safe and quality care; communications; collaboration and teamwork; health education; legal responsibilities; ethico-moral responsibility; personal and professional development; management of environment and resources; record management; quality improvement; and research was determined. Finding the extent of the relationship between intellectual preparedness and educational attainment and general weighted average was also the objective of this research work. The descriptive method of research and correlational statistics were employed in this study. The researcher utilized a self-made diagnosis tool to assess the level of preparedness. The Intellectual Preparedness Diagnostic Test (IPDT), the major instrument used in this study, was patterned after the new test framework, which the Board of Nursing (BON) will implement in June of this year. It covered the eleven (11) key areas of nursing responsibilities and the five (5) major clinical nursing practice areas. The tool strictly followed the test scope guidelines given by the nursing authority in January 2006 during the orientation seminar for senior faculty and deans of schools of nursing in the country. Five nurse experts from their respective nursing practice areas checked the tool for content validity. Percentage was used to present the respondents profile in terms of educational attainment and general weighted average in the BSN Program (7 semesters and 2 summers). To show how intellectually prepared the respondents were in the eleven key areas and in each of the nursing practice test, their mean scores were obtained. Pearson's r was used to determine the degree of relationship between the independent variable (general weighted average) and the dependent variable (intellectual preparedness). The chi-square (^2) test was utilized to detect the degree of relationship between educational attainment, a nominal data, and the respondent's intellectual preparedness score. Findings showed that at alpha level of 0.05, a significant correlation existed between intellectual preparedness and educational attainment based on the computed ^2 value. The computed r -value established a high perfect positive correlation between intellectual preparedness and GWA. Both findings led to the rejection of the null hypothesis. This research work established that the general weighted average and the educational attainment of the subjects are directly and highly correlated. The respondents under the Education grouping performed well in the IPDT, particularly the College Graduates and College Level respondents. The above average respondents were found to be the most prepared to take the PNLE among the members of the GWA grouping. Based on their intellectual preparedness scores in the eleven (11) areas of nursing competencies, the 51 respondents were found to have the following intellectual preparedness levels: 3 were Satisfactory Prepared; 35 were Moderately Prepared; 8 were Least Prepared, and 4 were Unprepared. This means that the first two groups, the Satisfactory Prepared and the Moderately Prepared, have the most potential to pass the Philippine Nurse Licensure Examination (PNLE) if it were held at the time of data gathering. The period between the data gathering and the actual licensure examinations, when wisely used to prepare for a successful test taking could make the Least Prepared, or even the Unprepared respondents, pass the PNLE. This extrapolation by the researcher is based on the hypothesis that the IPDT measured the respondent's terminal competencies, where as, licensure examinations measure entry-level competencies where as, licensure examinations measure entry-level competencies. If the IPDT proved to be more difficult than the actual PNLE, the 8 respondents in the Least Prepared group could pass the exam. Following this line of logic and moving further, the researcher believed that 46 out of the 51 could pass the June 2006 examination. The high school GWA and the educational attainment of applicants to the college of nursing, together with the already existing nursing aptitude test (NAT), could be the bases of future admission requirements. Future researchers are invited to do follow up study on the respondents actual performance after the official result of the licensure examination had been announced. The predictive validity of the diagnostic tool could be measured and evaluated for the future use in the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig College of Nursing or in the other college of nursing. The results of the IPDT could be seen not merely as a feedback of strengths and weakness for the students but also for the nursing educators. Curriculum (what to teach) and instruction (how to teach) are two areas that need a lot of scrutiny for a new player in nursing education like PLP. Creation of evaluation tools to measure terminal competencies (learning outcomes) at each year level is encouraged by the researcher, if the school wants to produce quality graduates. From this study, interests may be generated among curriculum developers to establish a monitoring system that would check if what is written in the syllabi is actually executed by curriculum developers.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c30548
_d30548