000			07297nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			05194ntm a2200217 i 4500
001			81329
003			0
005			20250920175037.0
008			201103n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _aT Fil RT73 _d _b.E935 20062 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aBayanes, Sunshine P., Bustalinio, Aiza M., Gundayao, Joam Marie R., Matias, Sandra B., Puli, Harvie T., Roncesvalles, Hazelle B., Sandoval, William II A. [and] Villar, Joana Marie B. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aEvaluation of Battery Examination as a retention policy of the College of Nursing / _d _b _n _cprepared and submitted by Sunshine P. Bayanes, Aiza M. Bustalinio, Joam Marie R. Gundayao, Sandra B. Matias, Harvie T. Puli, Hazelle B. Roncesvalles, William Sandoval II, Joana Marie B. Villar _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c _axv, 110 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aUndergraduate (Thesis) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Intramuros, Manila, 2006.;In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Nursing. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the Battery Examination as a part of the retention policy of the College of Nursing. It sought to answer the following questions: First how do the College of Nursing administration, Nursing academe, and students evaluate the Battery examination in terms of : objectives, preparation of students, administration of the examination, releasing of results. Second, what are the common problems encountered by the respondents on the Battery Examination? Third, is there a significant relationship between the administration, faculty and students evaluation on Battery Examination? Fourth, what is the level of performance of nursing students in terms of : Battery Exam and General Weighted Average. Fifth, is there a significant relationship between the Battery Exam performance and the General Weighted Average? Lastly, based on the findings of the study, what aspect of the Battery Exam need to be enhanced? This study used descriptive and documentary analysis method of research to help the researchers determine the extent to which different variables are related to each other in the population of interest. The population in this study are 176 Senior BS Nursing students who undergone the Battery Examination in 2005, 9 faculty members who were employed at the year of examination, and 3 college administrators were chosen. Sampling technique utilized were purposive sampling for the students and faculty, while universal sampling for the college administrators. Based on the findings, the Battery Examination components namely, the Objectives, preparation, and Administration were properly carried out. The weak point of the said examination is the release component. The most common problems encountered by the respondents are the following: the original schedule of the battery exam was not observed, sleepless nights due to anxiety and fear of failing the exam, and the scores which were not presented to the students and their parents. Using the Chi-Square statistical treatment, it was found out that there was no significant relationship between the perceptions of the respondents regarding the objectives, preparation, and administration of the battery examination. On the other hand, the respondents perceptions on the release aspect of the Battery Examination showed a significant relationship. The Senior students' academic performance produced a very satisfactory outcome based on their General Weighted Average. Compared to their Battery Examination performance that was reflected in their Battery Examination Scores, which only came up with a satisfactory mark. Based on the Pearson's R correlation, it was revealed that there is no significant relationship between the Battery Examination performance and the General Weighted Average. The following recommendations are being forwarded based on the findings of the study: The researchers propose that the battery examination be abolished from the retention policy of the College of Nursing. PLM-CN has been maintaining its high standards of nursing education even without the existence of a battery examination. Moreover, as evidenced by the absence of significance between the battery examination scores and the GWA of the students, this demonstrate that those who made good grades in the battery examination is not assured of good academic performance post battery exam. This furthermore supports the stand of the researchers that the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila can definitely achieve its high standards of nursing education without the battery examination as an added burden on the students attainment of a high general weighted average. Instead, the students can focus their attention more on their academic performance by striving to achieve better General Weighted Average rather than focusing on the battery examination. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c30560 _d30560