000 08493nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 06372ntm a2200205 i 4500
001 80677
003 0
005 20250920175038.0
008 201007n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_aT Fil RT73.7
_d
_b.E935 20062
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aEvaluation of the learning experience of nursing students in anatomy and physiology under non-nursing professors /
_d
_b
_n
_cprepared and submitted by Joseph A. Bathan, Rolando V. Canlas Jr., Jan Christopher V. Lamban, Arnie-Cristine C. Ocampo, Anna Camille L. Posada, Joanne E. Tolentino, Crisa Karen G. Undazan and Laurice F. Vergabera
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c
_ax, 135 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (Undergraduate) --Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Intramuros, Manila, 2006.;In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Nursing.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning experience of third year nursing students in Anatomy and Physiology under non-Nursing professors. The learning experience and learning capability were evaluated through self-made questionnaires for this action research. The student survey form, was applied to evaluate the learning experience of the nursing students in terms of the components of a meaningful, engaged learning. Part one of the students questionnaire includes the academic profile which contains their names and their grades in the following subjects: Anatomy and Physiology, Community Health Nursing II, Basic Concepts in Nursing B, Pathophysiology, Maternal and Child Nursing I, and Microbiology. Part two includes the guidelines, indicating instructions for use. Following the guidelines are the 48 statements. The instructor survey form was employed to evaluate the learning capability of the nursing students in terms of the domains of learning. The first part includes the guidelines, stating the instructions for use. After which follows the twenty five statements. The relationships tested in this study included the relationship between the grade in Anatomy and Physiology and cumulative grade in nursing subjects of the nursing students; the relationship between the nursing students evaluation of learning experience and their grades in Anatomy and Physiology; and the relationship between the nursing students evaluation of learning experience and their cumulative grades in nursing subjects. This study used the descriptive-correlation research design. The respondents of the study were third year nursing students of batch 2009 and the nursing faculty. The total number of students that served sample was 168 while there were 9 for the faculty. The following conclusions were derived from the study: The grade in Anatomy and Physiology of most of the respondents were very good while the least number of respondents got a passing grade. In terms of their cumulative grades in nursing subjects, most of the respondents have a good grade and the least number of the respondents have acquired satisfactory grades. The student-faculty and student-student relationship categories are both effective for the theoretical and laboratory classes. Time utilization category is slightly effective for theoretical class and moderately effective for both theoretical and laboratory class. In the theoretical class, self study is the most used measure of coping as well as in laboratory class. On the other hand, extension of class hours is the least used measure of coping for both classes. Interest and autonomy are moderately effective for both classes. Interest and autonomy are moderately effective for both classes. Perceived benefits category is effective for both classes. Connections and context are moderately effective in theoretical class while effective in laboratory class. The environment component of both classes was effective. The experience component of both classes was moderately effective. Motivation component was effective for both classes. Meaning component was moderately effective in theoretical class and was effective in laboratory class. There is a significant relationship between the grades in Anatomy and Physiology and the cumulative grades in nursing subjects. There is a significant relationship between students evaluation of learning experience and their grades in Anatomy and Physiology. There is a significant relationship between students evaluation of learning experience and their cumulative grades in nursing subjects. The evaluation of the learning capability in Anatomy and Physiology in terms of cognitive, effective, and psychomotor domains was moderately effective as utilized in nursing subjects. The overall learning experience for theoretical class was moderately effective and effective for laboratory class. The overall learning capability of the nursing students was moderately effective. The researchers have the following recommendations: For the University Administration, the researchers recommend that an evaluation be made with regards to the effectiveness of the Vertical Articulation policy. For the College of Science (CS), the researchers recommend to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of the teachers handling Anatomy and Physiology classes, not only in the College of Nursing (CN) but in other colleges as well. For the College Dean and Academic Coordinator of the College of Nursing, to ensure that the lessons in Anatomy and Physiology cover all the topics specified in the prescribed syllabus as well as to ensure that the proper phasing of the lessons is observed within the time frame allotted. For the CS faculty, the researchers suggest that they should facilitate a more interesting and informative classroom discussion through utilization of different teaching strategies such as hands-outs, audio visual presentations, cooperative learning, and peer teaching to motivate students and increase their interest. To improve time utilization, the researchers recommend to the professors the proper allocation of the specific number of hours for each topic or to have a calendar grid especially in the theoretical class.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c30569
_d30569