000 06650nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04522ntm a2200193 i 4500
001 91211
003 0
005 20250920175038.0
008 241002n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aPineda, Algelan M.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aPolicy implication of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila-College of Nursing battery examination as a screening tool for incoming BSN III students /
_d
_b
_n
_cAlgelan M. Pineda
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c3947946
300 _e
_e
_c
_axiii, 146 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_a
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: Battery Tests or Aptitude and ability tests are designed to assess student's logical reasoning or thinking performance. The test result will be deliberated and reviewed so that judgments can be made regarding student knowledge and abilities in terms of their nursing career in the future. This examination is commonly used to determine the general standing with respect to student's performance. Way back, April 2004, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila conducted their inaugural battery examination for the nursing students. The reason for this was that there is an increase in the number of enrollees which started in SY 2002-2003 and virtually a 400% increase in the number of freshmen students in the college. The implementing guidelines of the retention policy for nursing students for level III had it stated rationale the imperative need of the PLM College of Nursing, being recognized as one of the top nursing schools in the country, to make innovations to maintain the quality of nursing graduates that it produces. In lieu of this, the researcher, being the college secretary of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila-College of Nursing aimed to evaluate the policy implications of this battery examination to be able to use it as a screening tool for the incoming BSN III students. This was the ultimate purpose for the conduction of this study.by the Retrospective documentary analysis was performed by the researcher, utilizing the battery examination score and the general weighted averages in the first semester and second semester at the year level of the students in school year 2004-2005 as reflected in the PLM-College of Nursing official records. The nursing students who took and passed the same examination in SY 2004-2005 and later on were able to complete the third year of their study in the college was the sample in the study. The researcher utilized the records of the battery examination for incoming level III students (with the permission of the college dean-Nilo Capangpangan)of the college of nursing broken down into cumulative GWA from the first year to second year, written examination score, and the general weighted average for the first semester and the second semester at the third year of the student respondents to determine and describe their academic profile. Frequency count and percentage was utilized as statistical analysis of the above variables. With regards to determining if there is any significant relationship among the different variables cited in problem number two, Pearson's was utilized. The study found out that the academic profile of the respondents in terms of cumulative GWA yielded the result of 70.29% indicating a good academic performance; in terms of written score, most of them got 75-81% scores, interpreted as satisfactory academic performance; while for the interview score, most of them yielded a score of 86-90%; in terms of the overall battery point, most of them got 76-79%. In terms of correlation of CGWA to academic performance in terms of GWA in the first semester and second semester of the BSN III level, it resulted in a moderate correlation, marked relationship; while the value of r obtained for the GWA in the second semester of the same year was also moderate level of correlation. The difference suggested a significant relationship between cumulative GWA from the first year and second year of the students who took the battery examinations and their subsequent GWA in the third year level. For the degree of relationship between written examination and GWA in the first semester and second semester of the BSN III level, the value of r was equated to a magnitude of low correlation and moderate correlation respectively.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c30571
_d30571