000 10523nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 08756ntm a2200241 i 4500
001 46420
003 0
005 20250921111108.0
008 141112n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aCabrera, Josephine P.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aAn analysis of the home study program of Angelicum College, Quezon City :
_d
_bbasis for a proposed policy guidelines /
_n
_cJosephine P. Cabrera.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c26 cm.
_axiii, 170 pages :
_billustrations
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2010.;A thesis presented to the Graduate School of arts and Sciences and Education, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in Education Major in Educational Administration.;Includes bibliographical references.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aThe separation of the student and the teacher is a fundamental characteristic of distance education. In any distance education process there must be a teacher, one or more students; a curriculum that a teacher is capable of teaching and a student who is trying to learn. Every instructional process involves a strategic assessment system for a complete teaching-learning circle. There may be researches showing that distance education is an effective method for teaching and learning. An analysis or evaluation could be undertaken to improve distance education and determine the worth of distance education activities. This study was an attempt to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the Home Study Program of Angelicum College, Quezon City which has been in existence 1996. The analysis focused on the three aspects of the Home Study Program namely; the Home Study Program system, the facilitators and their facilitating skills and the testing and evaluation process. The descriptive method was used in the study. The research which used the survey technique had a total population of 276 respondents. The respondents were composed of the following: 11 administrators, 13 learning facilitators, 56 parents/guardians and 196 learners. A focused group discussion was also used to validate other information gathered in the survey. The profiles of administrators and learning facilitators were determined using frequency and percentage. Likewise, the learners' entry level in HSP and the number of years in the program were determined to prove the reliability of the respondents' perceptions. In order to get the perceptions of the groups of respondents a survey questionnaire using a five point Likert-scale was used. Weighted means of the responses were computed and interpreted. To determine the significant differences of respondents' perceptions, a one-way analysis of variance was used. The findings of the study revealed that the four groups of respondents namely, the administrators, learning facilitators, parents/guardians and learners had similar opinions on the implementation of the Home Study Program. The computed grand weighted mean of the learning administrators' perceptions was 1.84, the computed mean of the learning facilitators' perceptions was 1.59, the parents/guardians' perceptions had 1.96 computed mean and the learners had 1.94. All had a verbal interpretation of Agree. The administrator-respondents doubted that the system made learners feel that what mattered more was what he/she learned than the judgment of someone. There were also doubts on the perceptions of parents and learners on the indicator that the Home Study Program would encourage procrastination. They even stated that the Home Study Program helped them focus more on difficult subjects like Math and Science and allowed them to spend more time on those subjects. With regard to the area of facilitators and their facilitating skills, the four groups of respondents had similar perceptions. The computed grand weighted mean of the administrators' perceptions was 1.92, the learning facilitators' was 2.00, the parents/guardians was 2.03 and the learners' was 1.73 with Agree on verbal interpretation. The study also revealed that there were ambiguities on the perceptions of parents and learners especially on the aspects of facilitators' utilization of electronic gadgets and multimedia devices. In the same manner, the learning facilitators, expressed hesitation on the part where they encouraged learners to engage in cooperative learning activities. It was revealed in the focus group discussion that learners participated in cooperative learning activities only in a limited manner. This was also affirmed by the administrator-respondents. On the part of guiding, monitoring and recording of learners' progress, the study revealed a Strongly Agree perception of the learners. This was further confirmed in the focus group discussion. Majority of the learners mentioned that the learning facilitators really kept track of each and every learners' performance. On the aspect of testing and evaluation, all the groups of respondents were united in their perceptions. The computed weighted mean of administrators' perception was 2.43, the learning facilitators' was 2.43, the learning facilitators' was 2.33, the parents/guardians' was 2.19 and the learners' was 2.44 with a verbal interpretation of Agree. There were doubts on the perceptions of learning facilitators and parents on the indicator that learners developed complacency because they would not fail. This part negated by the learners during the focus group discussion. They even stressed that they liked it because they were given many opportunities to pass. The study also revealed that the three groups of respondents (administrators, learning facilitators and parents) expressed uncertainty on the indicator that retests delayed normal class schedule and it encouraged dependence on re-testing. This was confirmed during FGD that there were learners who took advantages of re-testing but finding these would signal a learning to provide interventions. The administrators and learning facilitators even explained during the focus group discussion that re-testing was part of the unique system of the Home Study Program and it was part and parcel of the mastery learning program. This was probably the reason why facilitators and parents/ guardian disagreed on the indicator that re-tests encouraged laziness. Administrators and learners were also not sure if peer teaching was an effective strategy while parents and facilitators perceived this as effective. On the possibility of having collaborative project among learners, the study revealed that the facilitators were not sure if this could be done. Looking at the significant difference on the perceptions of the four groups of respondents, the two variables namely, the Home Study Program System and the facilitators and their facilitating skills, had a computed F-value of 2.11 and 0.70. These were less than the critical value of 2.63 at 0.05 level of significance. Therefore, the null hypothesis was accepted. The third variable, the testing and evaluation processes had a computed F-value of 3.26, greater than the critical value of 2.63 at 0.05 level of significance; therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. The study recommends policy guidelines that include the following areas of concern: A. A mechanism on re-testing practices that will develop the learners' sense of mastery and self-direction. B. Utilize multimedia and other gadgets to make instruction meaningful and engaging to learners. C. Provide supplementary materials like books and website references for better delivery of instructions. D. Arrange learners' schedule to include cooperative learning activities and collaborative projects. E. Give premium to learners who engage in peer-tutoring. 2. A continuing development program for administrators and learning facilitators to internalize and develop the owning of the system 3. A continuous orientation/re-orientation of the learners to make full use of the system to their advantage. 4. A program for parents/guardians to better understand the Home Study Program system and be partners with the college in the holistic development of learners.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c32119
_d32119