000			13032nam a2201237Ia 4500
000			11221ntm a2200229 i 4500
001			69429
003			0
005			20250921111115.0
008			171122n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aVillamar, Eric M. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aDevelopment of a policy framework for the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office / _d _b _n _cEric M. Villamar. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _a189 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2011.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Business Administration. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aThis study entitled The development of Policy Framework for the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office examined the significant contribution of PCSO on the economy of the country with an attempt to develop a policy framework that can be utilized to enhance its performance. It specifically sought answers to the following questions: 1. What is the status of the PCSO indicators with regard to the following: 1.1 Revenues, 1.2 Expenses, 1.3 Investment, 1.4 Cost of Labor, 1.5 Community Projects, 1.6 Prizes Paid, 1.7 Taxes Paid, 1.8 Business Establishments? 2. What is the trend and growth rate of the following economic indicators for the last ten years in terms of: 2.1 Gross Domestic Product, 2.2 Personal Consumption Expenditures, 2.3 Government Investments, and 2.4 Government Spending? 3. Is there a significant relationship between the performance indicators of the PCSO and the economic indicators in problem 2? 4. How can a policy be developed to enhance the performance of the PCSO? 5. What are the constraints and limitations of the PCSO that affect its performance? The null hypothesis was tested and rejected in this study: 1. There is no significant relationship between the performance indicators of the PCSO and the following selected economic variables: 1.1 Gross Domestic Product, 1.2 Personal Consumption Expenditures, 1.3 Government Investment, and 1.4 Government Spending. The historical method of research was used to find solution to the stated problem. The historical design made use of critical investigations of the past ten (10) years, from 1999-2008, and audited annual reports of PCSO. This study also used the quantitative method through mathematical computation of different formulated business models. Quantitative models were separated into three basic types: time series and causal models, system models, and sophisticated models incorporating elements of each. The descriptive method in acquiring the desired information was also used through Focus Group Discussion. Guide questionnaires were also utilized and resulted in fruitful discussion among the sixteen (16) participants from various departments of PCSO. Two separate sessions were conducted. The following findings and conclusions were derived from the analysis and interpretation of data; The status of the different PCSO, performance indicators were presented by trend and growth rate. It was discussed in the order enumerated in the problem. An unstable growth rate of PCSO's Revenue indicators were observed during the ten years period. PCSO's revenue declined during the Estrada's administration. In 2005, President Arroyo tasked the PCSO to introduce the Small Town Lottery (STL) as a substitute to jueteng in the National and Local levels. This contributed to the PCSO's revenue increase and it reached a growth rate of 29.06%. In 2006, online game, Keno, contributed additional sales revenues, and reached its maximum of P20 billion in 2008. PCSO's expenses showed positive growth rate every year for the past ten years. A significant investments were placed on a short term maturity investment at the Landbank of the Philippines and Philippine National Bank, respectively. However, from 2003 to 2008 a negative growth rate was experienced by the PCSO in terms of investments. The cost of labor had positive growth rate every year and employees concerned seemed contented. The top community projects sustained by PCSO were Medical Assistance & Service Program, Health & Welfare Program; PCSO Charity Clinic; 5% Share of LGU; Commission on Higher Education; Aids to National Calamities; TB Control Program; Funeral and Burial Assistance; and the Sports and Development Program. Price Fund expenses exhibited the highest indicator of PCSO's total expenses. Prizes paid by the PCSO declined in 2000 at the rate of 6.73% and the lowest growth rate for the past ten-year period. Unstable growth rate was observed in the PCSO's taxes paid to the government. The highest taxes paid were observed during the year 2006 with a growth rate of 116.16% due to payment of documentary stamps. PCSO's business establishments experienced an unstable growth rate too. The lowest was observed in 2000 at the rate of -43.62%. That was the time when the Estrada's administration was ousted. A slight increase was observed after the transition in 2001 with the growth rate of 5.75%. A huge amount of growth rate was experienced in the year 2003 at the rate of 133.96%. As observed, the actual values of economic indicators exhibited a continuous increase but as for growth rate, they were unstable. These were attributable to the change in the government administration, effect of the global financial crisis and calamities experienced in the country. The null hypothesis was rejected that there is no correlation between the performance indicators of PCSO and the selected economic variables. Statistical test revealed that there were significant relationships between the PCSO performance indicators and the selected Economic Indicator. Model-1 on page 78, GDP vs. REV, EXP and INVT, revealed that for every P1M decrease in PCSO's revenue, GDP decreases by P1.9M. The value 1.52 shows that for every P1M increase in the GDP by P165M. In model-2 PCE vs. COL and PRIPD was interpreted as highly significant as discussed in page no. 80. Model-3 GINVT vs. INVT, COMPROJ, TAXPD and BUSEST was interpreted as significant and discussed on page no. 84. Model-4 GSPED vs. COMPROJ, TAXPD and BUSEST was interpreted as significant as discussed on page no. 87. PCSO Model-1 on page no. 88 showed the effect of revenue and investment on Expenses. Revenues were the most important indicator of PCSO's expenses. It was statistically significant at 5% level of significance. PCSO Model-2 on page no. 89 was about the effect of operating fund, price fund, and charity fund to PCSO's total revenue. Three indicators affected the total revenue. It was statistically significant at 5% level of significance. Given the three indicators, charity fund exhibited the most indicator that contributed to the total PCSO's revenues. PCSO Model-3 on page 92 was all about the effect of different games on the total revenues. It shows that all the number games were interpreted as highly significant. Keno being introduced only in 2006 was the least significant. PCSO Model-4 on page 94 presented the effect of selected community projects to the total projects. It is interpreted to have statistical significance. Based on the focus group interviews conducted last January 20, 2011, the responses clearly showed the constraints and its limitations. On the revenues, all were accounted for and audited with the exception of those collections reported by the STL operations are not under PCSO supervisions and control, thus no regular audit was conducted to attest the veracity of the financial records submitted. Revenues from Keno games were keeping up, but very slow despite the 100% increase in sales. This could be attributed to the computer access and skills of the gaming public. With regard to PCSO expenses, participant could not of any negative issues or limitations on PCSO expenses. Most of PCSO participants were not aware of their company investments. Some replied that PCSO had time deposits placed at the Philippine National Bank and Landbank of the Philippines, regardless, of interest rates being offered in the market. Under the cost of labor, extra bonuses at anniversary and an easy access to medical services and assistance were the most precious advantages they could avail of. The normal change of power in the government brought changes in the various projects of PCSO. Delays and difficulties in the project implementation were experienced. There were some unclaimed prizes and delays in reverting back to charity fund after a year. No record of tax cases was filed and pending in court, only few adjustments on imposition of taxes on was employees' fringe benefits in excess of P30,000. As of to date, there are 69 legal cases pending in different courts. They are mostly civil and criminal cases against erring sweepstakes and lotto agents. This resulted in the strict implementation of the requirement to get PCSO franchise.
520			_a Based on the findings of the study the following conclusions were formulated: 1. PCSO's performance indicators used in the study indicated an unstable growth rate for the past ten-year period. The transition of government significantly affected the growth rate of the PCSO's financial indicators. However, a slight increase in the growth rate was observed after the transition period. The PCSO performance indicators were affected by the various limitations and constraints as gathered in the focus group interview. 2. Economic indicators exhibited a contentious increase. The increase or decrease in the growth rate of the economic indicators has something to do with the transition of the government, the development plan of the government and the natural calamities that the economy experienced during the past ten years. 3. The null hypothesis was rejected. There was a significant correlation between the performance indicators of PCSO and economic variables. 4. The significant effects shown by the four (4) PCSO Models presented can enhance further the PCSO performance. 5. Based on the results of the focus group interview as guided questionnaires, the following limitation and constraints were gathered: a. Revenues were fairly presented, except those from STL operations that were not examined. b. Expenses were properly recognized, examined and presented, thus, no comments, nor suggestions of significant values were gathered. c. Investments were perceived by all as strictly confidential and taken care of by the top management. It was also perceived as not PCSO's top priority. d. Community projects need to consider some mandatory contributions to be served and recorded. e. Prizes p _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c32148 _d32148