| 000 | 07488nam a2201225Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 000 | 05634ntm a2200229 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | 70301 | ||
| 003 | 0 | ||
| 005 | 20250921111121.0 | ||
| 008 | 180112n 000 0 eng d | ||
| 010 |
_z _z _o _a _b |
||
| 015 |
_22 _a |
||
| 016 |
_2 _2 _a _z |
||
| 020 |
_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x |
||
| 022 |
_y _y _l _a2 |
||
| 024 |
_2 _2 _d _c _a _q |
||
| 028 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 029 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 032 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 035 |
_a _a _b _z _c _q |
||
| 037 |
_n _n _c _a _b |
||
| 040 |
_e _erda _a _d _b _c |
||
| 041 |
_e _e _a _b _g _h _r |
||
| 043 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 045 |
_b _b _a |
||
| 050 |
_a _a _d _b2 _c0 |
||
| 051 |
_c _c _a _b |
||
| 055 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 060 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 070 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 072 |
_2 _2 _d _a _x |
||
| 082 |
_a _a _d _b2 _c |
||
| 084 |
_2 _2 _a |
||
| 086 |
_2 _2 _a |
||
| 090 |
_a _a _m _b _q |
||
| 092 |
_f _f _a _b |
||
| 096 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 097 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 100 |
_e _e _aAlvero, Lara S. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16 |
||
| 110 |
_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k |
||
| 111 |
_a _a _d _b _n _c |
||
| 130 |
_s _s _a _p _f _l _k |
||
| 210 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 222 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 240 |
_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k |
||
| 245 | 0 |
_a _aDevelopment and validation of self-confidence scale for college students / _d _b _n _cLara S. Alvero. _h6 _p |
|
| 246 |
_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p |
||
| 249 |
_i _i _a |
||
| 250 |
_6 _6 _a _b |
||
| 260 |
_e _e _a _b _f _c _g |
||
| 264 |
_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46 |
||
| 300 |
_e _e _c28 cm. _aviii, 153 pages _b |
||
| 310 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 321 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 336 |
_b _atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 340 |
_2 _20 _g _n |
||
| 344 |
_2 _2 _a0 _b |
||
| 347 |
_2 _2 _a0 |
||
| 362 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 385 |
_m _m _a2 |
||
| 410 |
_t _t _b _a _v |
||
| 440 |
_p _p _a _x _v |
||
| 490 |
_a _a _x _v |
||
| 500 |
_a _aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2008.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Psychology major in Clinical Psychology. _d _b _c56 |
||
| 504 |
_a _a _x |
||
| 505 |
_a _a _b _t _g _r |
||
| 506 |
_a _a5 |
||
| 510 |
_a _a _x |
||
| 520 |
_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: Descriptive-correlational research method was employed in the development and validation of self-confidence scale. The major purpose of this study is to substantiate a self-confidence scale, enough to check the factors that will describe the level of self-confidence of tertiary students. The dimensions of the newly constructed self-confidence scale are personal, academic, social and positive attitude. The self-confidence is composed of 100 statements equally divided into four dimensions. The researcher made use of multi stage stratified random sampling technique in setting the participants. The newly developed scale went through the series of evaluation: face validation, vocabulary screening, content validation and test- retest reliability procedure. Specifically, this study seeks to answer the following questions: 1. What are the dimensions that would compose the proposed self-confidence scale? 2. What is the inter-judge degree of concordance on the items of the proposed self confidence scale? 3. What is the index of content validity of the instrument, when subjected to item analysis? 4. What is the index of reliability of the instrument when subjected to test re-test procedures? 5. Is there a significant relationship between and among the four dimensions of self-confidence scale? The findings of the study were as follows: 1. The constructed scale after the test of reliability and validity is composed of 100 items categorized under the four dimensions: personal, academic, social and positive attitude. 2. The test went through the process of face validation, vocabulary leveling and content validation, item analysis and test- retest reliability procedure. 3. The validated 100 item scale initially had 211 statements. 4. The face validation result showed that out of 211 statements, 165 statements were accepted. 5. The vocabulary validation result reflected that out 165 statements, 148 were accepted. 6. The initial content validation revealed that out of 148 statements, 128 were accepted. 7. The content validation ratio reveals that out of 128 test items subjected to an inter judge procedure, only 120 items are retained. 8. The item analysis reflected a minimum of .30 and maximum of .70 which were both under the acceptable value of correlation. 9. The result of One-way Anova for each college revealed that academic performance is not related to self-confidence level. 10. The test - retest procedure showed a computed value of .9524, which signified high correlation result between the trials made. 11. The Pearson r was used to evaluate the significant relationship between and among the four factors of self-confidence scale. Evaluations of the aforementioned outcomes suggested the following conclusions: 1. The self-confidence scale successfully passed the face validation. 2. The self-confidence scale qualified for the vocabulary leveling of college students. 3. The self-confidence scale earned its preliminary content validation. 4. The self-confidence passed the test - retest validity. 5. The self-confidence scale exhibited internal consistency of items. 6. The self-confidence scale revealed that significant relationship exists between and among its four dimensions. Based on the study, the following recommendations were offered: 1. That criteria validation be set to test further the validity of the scale. 2. That Filipino translated self-confidence scale be constructed to supplement its objective of localizing psychological test in the country. 3. That lesser number of items be set for easier administration, scoring and interpretation. 4. That the future researcher in the same topic includes students from other colleges and universities as respondents. 5. That the teachers should help the students to develop feeling of self-worth so that they will be more confident, self-assured and optimistic. 6. That the teachers be more sensitive in identifying students and will make use of the scale as a preliminary tool to her assesses the confidence level of the students. 7. That the respondents of this study will develop trust among themselves by reaffirming his or her own uniqueness, and visualize themselves as confident and self assured. 8. That a development program for improving the level of self-confidence of the college students maybe patterned first to self-confidence test. _u |
||
| 521 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 533 |
_e _e _a _d _b _n _c |
||
| 540 |
_c _c _a5 |
||
| 542 |
_g _g _f |
||
| 546 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 583 |
_5 _5 _k _c _a _b |
||
| 590 |
_a _a _b |
||
| 600 |
_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y |
||
| 610 |
_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y |
||
| 611 |
_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v |
||
| 630 |
_x _x _a _d _p20 _v |
||
| 648 |
_2 _2 _a |
||
| 650 |
_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v |
||
| 651 |
_x _x _a _y20 _v _z |
||
| 655 |
_0 _0 _a _y2 _z |
||
| 700 |
_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6 |
||
| 710 |
_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a |
||
| 711 |
_a _a _d _b _n _t _c |
||
| 730 |
_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k |
||
| 740 |
_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6 |
||
| 753 |
_c _c _a |
||
| 767 |
_t _t _w |
||
| 770 |
_t _t _w _x |
||
| 773 |
_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p |
||
| 775 |
_t _t _w _x |
||
| 776 |
_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w |
||
| 780 |
_x _x _a _g _t _w |
||
| 785 |
_t _t _w _a _x |
||
| 787 |
_x _x _d _g _i _t _w |
||
| 800 |
_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v |
||
| 810 |
_a _a _b _f _t _q _v |
||
| 830 |
_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v |
||
| 942 |
_a _alcc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c32178 _d32178 |
||