000			11723nam a2201237Ia 4500
000			09711ntm a2200217 i 4500
001			70814
003			0
005			20250921113121.0
008			180130n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aLagutan, Rizalyn A. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aThe personal & social adjustment patterns and the emotional intelligence of first offenders housed at Camp Sampaguita Muntinlupa / _d _b _n _cRizalyn A. Lagutan. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axi, 80 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2002.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences, and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Psychology. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The study determined the personal and social adjustment problems of first offenders housed at Camp Sampaguita, Muntinlupa and their relation to emotional intelligence. Specifically, this study sought answers to the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the first-offenders in the National Penitentiary in terms of: a. Age b. Civil status c. Educational attainment d. Religion e. Crimes committed f. Years of sentence 2. What is the profile of the respondents when grouped according to: a) Personal adjustment 1) Self Reliance 2) Sense of Personal Worth 3) Sense of Personal Freedom 4) Feeling of Belongingness 5) Withdrawal Tendencies 6) Nervous Symptoms b) Social adjustment 1) Social Standards 2) Social Skills 3) Anti-Social Tendencies 4) Family Relations 5) School Relations 6) Community Relations 3. What is the emotional intelligence of the respondents according to the following categories: a) Emotional awareness b) Managing moods c) Self-motivation d) Empathy e) Coaching one's emotions 4. How does the sociodemographic profile of the respondents relate with the following variables: a) Personal adjustment b) Social adjustment c) Emotional intelligence 5. Is there a significant relationship between the personal social adjustment patterns of the respondents when grouped according to the following categories of the emotional intelligence test: a) Emotional awareness b) Managing one's emotion c) Self-motivation d) Empathy e) Coaching one's emotion HYPOTHESIS 1. The sociodemographic profile of the respondents does not significantly relate with the following variables: a) Personal adjustment pattern b) Social adjustment pattern c) Emotional intelligence 2. There is no significant relationship between the personal and social adjustment patterns of the respondents when grouped according to the following categories of emotional intelligence: a) Emotional awareness b) Managing one's emotion c) Self-motivation d) Coaching one's emotion RESEARCH DESIGN: Descriptive Method SAMPLES AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: First Offenders detained in Bureau Corrections for the year 2001 in Camp Sampaguita Area or medium penitentiary Convenient Sampling technique in the selection of the respondents was used, because of the risk involve in interviewing and all not available. INSTRUMENT USED: The California Test of Personality by Louis T., Willis W. Clark and Ernest W. Tiegs 1952, and the Emotional Intelligence Self-Evaluation by Steine Hein, 1999. STATISTICAL TREATMENT: 1. Computation of simple percentage 2. Chi-square tested the relationship between each of the profile variable and the personal adjustment and emotional intelligence. 3. Pearson r- tested the significant correlation between the emotional intelligence of the first offenders and the personal and social adjustment patterns. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: 1. Sociodemographic profile of the offenders in the National Penitentiary. 1.1 Age- Majority are between 30 and below which is 50%. 31 and below is 32% and 41 and above is 18%. 1.2 Civil Status- 61% are single, 37% of the first offenders are married and 2% are separated. 1.3 Educational attainment- Majority of the first offenders are high school graduates with 52%, 37% has reached college level while 11% reached elementary level. 1.4 Religion- Most of the first offenders are Catholic which is 76%. Born Again Christian is 11%. Other religion is 13%. 1.5 Crimes Committed- The highest percent in crimes committed against life is 63%, against property is 17%, sex-related is 7%, drug-related is also 7% and illegal possession of firearms is 6%. 1.6 Years of Sentenced- Most of the first offenders were sentenced to 7 to 20 years in prison which is 38%, 4 years and below is 29%, 12-22 years sentence 28%, and 18 years to life is only 5%. 2. 2.21 The Personal Adjustment Profile of the respondents as to: Self-reliance is 9.25% which is the highest of all the categories, belongingness is 9.11%, personal worth is 8.5%, withdrawing tendencies is 7.56%. All this categories are average. Personal freedom is 6.26% and nervous symptoms is 6.68% which is below average. The personal adjustment had a total of 47.9% which is below average. This only shows that they have personal adjustment difficulty inside the detention. 2.2 The social adjustment profile of the respondents as to: Social standard is 6.86%, social skills is 7.79% , anti-social tendencies is 7.28%, family relations is 6.08%, social relationship is 7.49% and community relationship is 7.05%. The social adjustment profile had a total percent of 42.86% which is below average. This implies that the respondents were definitely experienced difficulty in social judgment. Therefore, it is very difficult for them to adjust with others and maintain good interpersonal relationship with others. 3. The emotional intelligence mean of the respondents in all categories was 52.8. Which means that the respondents need substantial development in all categories in emotional awareness, managing one's emotions, self-motivation, empathy and coaching others emotions. 4. 4.1 There is no significant relationship between age, educational attainment, religious affiliations, crimes committed, and years of sentence and personal adjustment. But there is a significant relationship between civil status and personal adjustment. 4.2 There is no significant relationship between age, religious affiliation, crimes committed, years of sentence and social adjustment. 4.3 There is a significant relationship between age, educational attainment, religious affiliation, crimes committed and emotional intelligence. But there is a significant relationship between civil status, years of sentence and emotional intelligence. 5. There is a significant relationship between the social and personal adjustment patterns of the respondents patterns of the respondents, when grouped according to the following categories of the emotional intelligence; emotional awareness, managing one's emotion, self motivation, empathy and coaching one's emotion. CONCLUSION: 1. That there is no significant relationship between the age, educational attainment, religious affiliation, crimes committed and number of years of sentence and personal adjustment. Civil status appeared to have a significant relationship with personal adjustment. 2. That there is a significant relationship between age, educational attainment, religious affiliation, crimes committed and years of sentence and social adjustment. Civil status and educational attainment appeared to have a significant relationship with social adjustment. 3. That there is a significant relationship between age, educational attainment, religious affiliation and crimes committed and the emotional intelligence of the respondents. Civil status and years of sentence appeared to have no significant relationship. 4. That there is a significant relationship between personal and social adjustment patterns with all areas of emotional intelligence such as emotional awareness, managing one's emotions, self motivation, empathy and coaching one's emotions. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That this research be conducted again using a big number of subjects for further validate the result of this experiment. And a study similar to this one be done on the female prisoners to find out if they have the same personal-social adjustment and emotional intelligence. 2. That a more extensive screening of newly admitted prisoners with extreme insecurity and adjustment problems particularly social and personal, be implemented using other psychological test materials and procedures in order to identify their adjustment problems that they will be experiencing so that proper and immediate intervention be given. 3. That seminars and workshop be conducted which deals on how to overcome adjustment problems and emotional problems for attitudinal change to improve the outlook of those concerned to such places like Bureau of Corrections. Such activities will help sustain the first offenders especially the newly admitted one.
520			_a 4. The school administration inside the Bureau of Corrections should develop a program of activities like inversion activities between the first offenders to enhance their emotional and psychological capabilities as individuals. 5. A seminar be conducted on the economic preparation for out of prison activities and study on the vocational preparation and activities of prisoners so that they will be productive members of society. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c35157 _d35157