000 07290nam a2201237Ia 4500
000 05504ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 69427
003 0
005 20250921113135.0
008 171122n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aTurner, Tranggano Imam Suwongso.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aThe management systems framework of hospitals in Jakarta /
_d
_b
_n
_cTranggano Imam Suwongso Turner.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axviii, 174 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2000.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Business Administration.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aIndonesian hospitals encounter various challenges in providing adequate health care services. The accreditation of hospitals was introduced in 1996 to alleviate the long history of mediocre service care (Ministry of Health, 1996), yet up to now has only been slowly embraced by Indonesian hospitals. Another challenge is the government pressure for Indonesian hospitals to acquire and manage its own resources and to be less reliant on subsidies. There two phenomena led to the crux of the dissertation problem: whether present hospital management practices can meet the emerging demands of hospitals socioeconomic objectives. There is a notable research gap in hospital management practice literature, especially in an Indonesian setting, which makes it worthwhile to conduct this study. Key concepts, models and definitions are researched to come up with a hospital management systems framework. Based on the framework, a descriptive survey on general hospitals in Jakarta was then conducted to investigate four key research objectives: the delineation of socioeconomic objectives; the translation of objectives into budget; presence of planning, implementation and control infrastructure; and presence of feedback mechanism. General hospitals were selected as the subjects of the study, as they are generally considered as the most complex organization within the healthcare delivery system. Four hypotheses concerning the key objectives were tested using chi-square statistical computation. The null hypotheses were: 1.
521 _aHospitals have no clear delineation of their socioeconomic objectives 2.
525 _aThe translation of objectives into budget is not performed adequately 3.
530 _aThere is inadequate planning, monitoring, and feedback infrastructure present at hospitals 4.
533 _eProper monitoring and feedback mechanisms are not conducted The alternative hypotheses were: 1.
536 _aHospitals have clear delineation of their socioeconomic objectives. 2.
538 _aThe translation of objectives into budgeting is performed adequately 3.
540 _cThere is adequate planning, monitoring, and feedback infrastructure present at hospitals 4.
542 _gDelineation of the socioeconomic objectives 2.
546 _aTranslation of objectives into budget 3.
550 _aPresence of planning, implementation and control infrastructure 4.
555 _aPresence of monitoring and feedback mechanism A hospital management systems framework was then developed as a synthesis of the four partial constructed models. The variables comprising the model were validated by means of questionnaire distributed to hospital directors in Jakarta. The statistical tests indicated the rejection of all four null hypotheses. Six areas of concern were raised by the results of the statistical tests: 
580 _aEffectiveness objective 
583 _5Budget process 
588 _aImplementation infrastructure 
590 _aControl infrastructure 
591 _aMonitoring mechanism Based on the decision rule, it was decided that as regards hospitals in Jakarta, present hospital management practice could meet in general the socioeconomic objectives with some weak areas of concern. The understanding of these areas of concern gives practical value to the Hospital Directors considering that more than 60% of these top hospital executives have no formal training in management. The business implication of this research comes from the original model put forth that can be used as diagnostic tools for gauging the ability of general hospitals in Indonesia to meet their socioeconomic objectives. The same tool can be applied in different general hospital population to give comparisons, or benchmarks of hospital management systems performance in lieu of fulfilling the socioeconomic objectives; therefore setting up an impetus for better management standards for hospitals in Indonesia.
_u
592 _a
_a
_b
610 _b
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
648 _2
_c
_a5
651 _x
_g
_f
653 _a
_a
_b
730 _s
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
753 _c
_a
_b
774 _t
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
775 _t
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
776 _s
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
780 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
785 _t
_2
_a
787 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
800 _a
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
830 _x
_0
_a
_y2
_z
942 _a
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
999 _c35230
_d35230