000			11885nam a2201237Ia 4500
000			09933ntm a2200229 i 4500
001			47680
003			0
005			20250921113145.0
008			141122n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aTorres, Josefina R. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aThe extent of adherence of the University of Santo Tomas management system to TQM constructs and principles : _d _binputs to institutional benchmarking strategies / _n _cJosefina R. Torres. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c26 cm. _axxiii, 382 pages : _billustration
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2002.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Science and Education,in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Education Major in Educational Administration.;Includes bibliographical references. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aSTATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 1. What is the demographic profile of group respondents in terms of the following variable: A. For Administrators and Faculty only: a. gender; b. age; c. civil status; d. highest educational attainment; e. teaching/administrative experience; f. academic rank; and B. For Students only: a. gender; b. age; and c. study program? 2. What is the extent of commitment of the University of Santo Tomas management system to the application of TQM constructs and principles in the context of leadership? 3. To what extent does the school respondent adhere to the TQM constructs and principles when grouped by: A. Colleges a. Architecture; b. Arts and Letters; c. Commerce; d. Education; e. Engineering; f. Fine Arts and Design; g. Music; h. Nursing; i. Pharmacy; j. Science, and B. Academic Sectors a. Administrators; b. faculty; and c. Students? 4. To what extent does the University of Santo Tomas adhere to the following TQM constructs and principles in the over-all management of the educational delivery services of the school: a. Vision b. Involvement c. Continuous Improvement; d. Training and Education; e. Ownership; f. Rewards and Recognition; g. Yearning for Success; and h. Customer Satisfaction? 5. Based on the respondents' personal profile, how do the extent of adherence of UST to the identified TQM constructs and principles, in regard to the aforesaid VICTORY - C components, significantly compare? 6. How does the extent of adherence of above-mentioned Colleges and Academic Sectors of UST to the TQM constructs and principles significantly compare? 7. Based on the extent of adherence to the TQM constructs and principles identified in the study, what TQM-based constructs and principles adhered to by the UST could be localized, vitalized and revitalized for purposes of institutional benchmarking strategies? Hypotheses Based on the preceding research questions, the following null hypotheses were tested at .05 level of significance: 1. There is no significant difference on the extent of adherence of UST to the TQM constructs and principles based on the following respondents' personal profile: A. For administrators and Faculty a. gender; b. age; c. civil status; d. highest educational attainment; e. teaching/administrative experience; f. academic rank; B. For Students only: a. gender; b. age; and c. study program? 2. There is no significant relationship on the extent of adherence of UST to the TQM constructs and principles when grouped by: A. Colleges a. Architecture; b. Arts and Letters; c. Commerce; d. Education; e. Engineering; f. Fine Arts and Design; g. Music; h. Nursing; i. Pharmacy; j. Science, and B. Academic Sectors a. Administrators; b. faculty; and c. Students? Methodology The researcher used the descriptive-evaluative method of research in obtaining the data needed to determine the extent of adherence of UST to the TQM constructs and principles. The main tools for data gathering were the survey questionnaire and interview. Respondents of this study consisted of 64 administrators, 234 faculty members and 371 graduating students from the ten colleges of UST offering baccalaureate degrees. Data were collected during the first and second semester of school year 2001-2002. The statistical methods applied were Percentage and Frequency Distribution Mean and Weighted Mean, Ranking, F-test through One-Way ANOVA and Pearson's Coefficient of Correlation. Major Findings 1. There is predominance of female administrators, faculty and students over their male counterpart; majority of the administrator and faculty respondents are of middle-aged professors (30-49 years of age) while almost half of the student-respondents are 19 years of age; majority of the administrator and faculty respondents are married majority of the administrators are masterate degree holders while majority of the faculty members are bachelor degree holders; majority of the administrators have an administrative experience of atleast 5 years; while majority of the faculty members have no administrative experience at all; majority of the administrator and faculty-respondents have a teaching experience of 15 years and above; majority of the administrator and faculty respondents belong to Assistant Professor level. 2. The extent of commitment of the University of Santo Tomas management system to the application of TQM constructs and principles in the context of leadership is found to be at a large extent. 3. UST, when grouped either by College of by Academic Sector, adheres to the TQM constructs and principles in the over-all management system of the educational delivery services of the school to a large extent. Based on the ranking of the grand mean, Vision is the principle most adhered to by UST, while Involvement is the least adhered to. The complete ranking of the principles adhered to are as follows: Vision (rank 1); Training and Education (rank 2); Recognition and Rewards (rank 3); Ownership (rank 4); Continuous Improvement (rank 5); Focus on Customer (rank 6); Yearning for Success (rank 7); and Involvement (rank 8). 4. There is no significant difference in the extent of adherence of UST to all or most of the TQM constructs and principles based on gender, civil status, educational attainment and academic rank of the respondents. However, i.e., there is significant difference in the extent of UST to all or most of the TQM constructs and principles, based on age, teaching experience, administrative experience, study program, college and academic sector factors. 5. There is slight almost negligible correlation between the groupings of UST by Colleges and UST's extent of adherence to Vision, Involvwment, Continuous Improvement, Training and Education, Ownership, Rewards and Recognition, Yearning for Success and Focus on Customer. This relationship, however, is not a significant, except in Continuous Improvement. 6. There is low correlation between the groupings of UST by Academic Sectors and its adherence to Vision. This relationship however is found to be not significant. 7. There is a slight, almost negligible correlation between the groupings of UST by Academic Sectors and the extent of its adherence to Involvement, Continuous Improvement, Training and Education, Ownership, Rewards and Recognition, Yearning for Success, and Focus on Customer. The correlation however is not significant except in Continuous Improvemet. 8. The TQM constructs and principles that need to be localized, vitalized and revitalized are Continuous Improvement, Yearning for Success, Ownership and Involvement. Recommendations: 1. The focus of the University should be geared towards localizing, vitalizing and revitalizing the principles of Involvement, Continuous Improvement, Yearning for Success and Focus on Customer. 1.1. A Permanent Continuous Quality Improvement Committee (CQIC) be established in every College in order to prioritize opportunities for improvement and to establish expectations. This committee is to be composed of the Department Head, selected faculty members and student leaders. The Dean shall serve as Quality Consultant, providing the needed resources and leadership support. 1.2. Periodic seminars and dialogues on total quality management be organized to make the faculty and students aware of the quality principles that can guide them in their quest for quality education; 1.3. Quality circles and study groups be formed in every College, as part of the quality management program. 2. Implement the proposed TQM Model for UST and the corresponding action plans to localize, vitalize and revitalize the following TQM constructs and principles: Continuous Improvement, Involvement, Involvement, Yearning for Success and Ownership. 3. More extensive faculty development programs to further improve the faculty profile; 4.
520			_aA similar study be conducted on the extent of adherence of non-academic or non-teaching employees to TQM constructs and principles; 5. Studies/assessment such as this be conducted regularly (yearly, as much as possible) to continuously determine the extent of adherence of the various sector so the university to TQM constructs and principles. Furthermore, since this study was focused only on the administrators at the College level, faculty members and students, other studies centered on the extent of adherence with top level administrators of the University as respondents be encouraged. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c35284 _d35284