000 09854nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 07856ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 69095
003 0
005 20250921113147.0
008 171106n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aFahimno, Nelly N.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aManagerial behavior of public elementary school administrators in the Division of City Schools Manila school year 1992-1993 /
_d
_b
_n
_cNelly N. Fahimno.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_a132 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1993.;A thesis presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and Education, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in Education Major in Educational Administration.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: Statement of the Problem: The major purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the managerial behavior of the public elementary school administrators in policy and decision-making and in overcoming problems in the Division of City Schools, Manila, School Year 1992-1993 as perceived by the administrators themselves and by the teachers. Specifically, it aimed to answer the following questions: 1. How do school administrators behave in policy and decision-making as self-perceived and as perceived by the teachers in the following areas: 1.1 scheduling of programs 1.2 providing co-curricular activities 1.3 planning for in-service education 1.4 promoting of teachers and 1.5 introducing of educational innovations 2. How do school administrators behave in overcoming problems involving: (1) teacher-pupil relationship; (2) teacher-teacher relationship and (3) teacher - administrator relationship as perceived by the administrators themselves and by the teachers? 3. Is there significant difference in the perceptions of the administrators behavior in policy and decision making as self-perceived and as perceived by the teachers? 4. Is there significant difference in the perceptions of the administrators' behavior in overcoming problems as perceived by the administrators themselves and by the teachers? The following null hypotheses were tested: 1. There was no significant difference between the perceptions of the school administrators and the perceptions of the teachers on the administrators' educational management behavior regarding policy and decision-making. 2. There was no significant difference between the perceptions of the school administrators and the teachers on the administrators' educational management behavior in overcoming problems. RESPONDENTS, INSTRUMENTATION AND PROCEDURE There were twenty public elementary school administrators and one hundred teachers who were randomly selected as respondents all over the six districts in the Division of City Schools, Manila. The descriptive normative research as a method of investigation was used in this study. A Likert type of questionnaire was prepared and trial-tested as an instrument in gathering data. This was administered to the administrators and teachers-respondents. This questionnaire consisted of fifty items on administrators' educational management behavior regarding policy and decision-making and thirty items on administrators' behavior in overcoming problems was distributed to which the respondents reacted. The responses were categorized and numerical description was assigned to each category. Responses to said questionnaire were tabulated, statistically using the weighted means and t-test. Findings 1. As perceived by the school administrators and by the teachers, most of the school administrators were democratic in policy and decision-making regarding scheduling of programs, providing co-curricular activities and promoting of teachers. However, in policy and decision-making regarding planning for in-service education and in introducing educational innovations, most of the school administrators encouraged their teachers to work hard in order to ensure better task performance. 2. In overcoming problems involving teacher-pupil relationship, teacher-teacher relationship and teacher-administrator relationship, the school administrators were concerned with the teachers and pupils' welfare. Cooperation in finding solutions to problems was emphasized for better administration. 3. The school administrator perceptions on administrators' educational management behavior in policy making and decision-making got higher mean than that of the teachers perceptions, however, there was no significant mean difference between the two sets of respondents. The behaviors, where most of the administrators manifested were the behaviors observed by the administrators and the teachers. 4. There was no significant mean difference between the perceptions of the administrators and the teachers on the administrators' educational management behavior in overcoming problems. The t-test result was .99 which was less than the tabular t-value, 1.98 at .05 level of significance. Most of the administrators demonstrated behaviors that most of the administrators and teachers observed in overcoming problems. The school administrators and teachers work harmoniously and cooperatively in overcoming school problems. Conclusions In light of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. The public elementary school administrators in the Division of City School, Manila, during school year 1992-1993, manifest democratic behavior in policy and decision-making regarding scheduling of programs, co-curricular activities and promotion of teachers. 2. The democratic administrators protect, uphold and recognize the potentials and integrity of their teachers at all times. 3. The authority vested by law to the administrators, to be one responsible for the success or failure of the school organization gives an alternative to some administrators to encourage their teachers in order to ensure better task performance. 4. In line with the policy and decision-making administrators and teachers have the same perceptions. 5. In overcoming problems, administrators and teachers perceive that cooperation among them is needed to provide solution to any problem that may arise in school. Recommendations In view of the findings and conclusions arrived at in this study, the following recommendations are presented: 1. School administrators should continue involving their teachers and encourage them to render active participation in scheduling of programs, co-curricular activities and in planning for in-service education. 2. School administrators should further provide their teachers expert services along certain lines especially educational innovations which would offer them changes for professional growth and development. 3. School administrators should be objective in recommendations and should follow strictly the merits and promotion plan of the Department of Education, Culture and Sports. 4. School administrators and teachers should continue working harmoniously in overcoming problems in school. 5. The findings of this study should be made available to the school administrators and teachers so that they would know and understand that the educational management behaviors of the administrators are the management behavior that the teachers would like them to manifest. 6. Since this study was conducted on the division level, it is further recommended that a similar study should be made in other divisions to make the findings more conclusive.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35295
_d35295