000 06577nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04574ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 60165
003 0
005 20250921113148.0
008 150908n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aHapita, Janette Martinez.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aAssessment of personality patterns and coping responses of selected army soldier :
_d
_befficacy of crisis intervention program /
_n
_cJanette Martinez Hapita.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axv, 109 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2012.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Psychology in Clinical Psychology.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: This study focuses on the assessment of the personality patterns and coping responses of selected Army soldiers assigned in the combat filed units of 2nd Infantry Division, Philippine Army (2ID, PA), in correlation with the crisis intervention program that is being implemented in the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). Specifically, the researcher measured and compared the personality patterns and coping adjustments of the respondents before and after the crisis intervention program. Also, the efficacy of the existing crisis intervention program in the AFP known as the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) was assessed based on the results of the study. In order to measure the personality patterns and coping adjustments of the selected Army soldiers, standardized test instruments were used. The Guilford Zimmerman Temperament Survey (GZTS) was administered to measure the personality patterns of the soldiers, while the Coping Responses Inventory- Adult Form (CRI-Adult) was used to assess their coping adjustments. Furthermore, to gather qualitative data, the Crisis Intervention Assessment Dorm which was an adaptation of the AFP's CISD report Form was facilitated by the researcher. The study applied the quasi- experimental research design, and the pretest-posttest method in identifying the difference between the personality patterns and coping adjustments of the respondents before and after the crisis intervention program. The respondents of the study were the selected Army soldiers who belonged to Class 16-2012 of the Restructured Reenlistment System Training of the Division Training Unit of 2ID, PA. The 88 respondents of the study were screened through purposive sampling. The criteria set were that the respondents must be from 21-35 years old, at least 3 years of combat experience, and have identified problems on either of the following areas: physical, emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and spiritual. To spilt the respondents into experimental and control group, random sampling was utilized. Findings showed that the intervention had increased the Experimental Group's inclination on Masculinity but revealed far from being Thoughtful. In addition, a significant difference was established on the scale of Restraint which meant that the group had become more serious-minded and self-controlled after the treatment. On the other hand, the Control group, after the physical activities, gained highest on Friendliness and lowest also on Thoughtfulness. As for the coping adjustments, both groups gained an identical result despite of a dissimilar intervention: highest on the scale of Seeking Alternative Rewards and lowest on Acceptance and Resignation. In conclusion, the CISD was assessed as effective based only on the specific areas where the experimental group had improved. But as a whole, the program was not able to reach the objective of enhancing all areas of the personality patterns and coping adjustments of the respondents. Based from the outcome of the study, the following are therefore recommended: that the AFP Mental Health Team should develop its crisis intervention program by introducing carefully selected physical activities; that the intervention be conducted at least once every year in all military camps, together with a follow-up to assess the efficacy of the program; and that soldiers be given more opportunity for group interaction.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35298
_d35298