000 08727nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 06748ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 70615
003 0
005 20250921113154.0
008 180119n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aLarce, Letecia C.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aThe emotional intelligence and personal variables of Maceda Integrated School teachers in relation to the academic performance of students /
_d
_b
_n
_cLetecia C. Larce.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiii, 60 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2002.;A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in School Principalship.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The study aimed to determine the relationship of emotional intelligence and personal variables of teachers with the academic performance of students. Specifically, it answered the following questions: 1. What is the personal profile of teacher respondents with regards to their: a. Age b. Educational attainment c. Performance rating d. Position/ salary grade e. Teaching experience 2. What is the emotional intelligence profile of teacher respondents based on the following competencies a. Emotional awareness b. Managing one's emotion c. Self-motivation d. Empathy e. Coaching other's emotion 3. What is the academic performance of students as revealed by their academic grades in the second grading period? 4. Is there a significant relationship between the personal variables of teacher respondents and the academic performance of their students? 5. How do the emotional intelligence of teachers relate with their personal variables? 6. Is there a significant relationship between the emotional intelligence of teacher respondents and the academic performance of students? The following null hypotheses were tested in the study at .05 level of significance: 1. There is no significant relationship between the personal variables of teacher respondents with the academic performance of their students. 2. The emotional intelligence of teachers is not related to their personal variables. 3. There is no significant relationship between emotional intelligence of teachers and the academic performance of students. The descriptive research was employed in the study using a questionnaire for teachers' profile variables and the Emotional Intelligence Self-Evaluation by Steve Hein for the emotional profile of teachers. Mean, standard deviations, and percentage distribution were used in describing teachers' personal profile, emotional intelligence profile and students' academic performance. Relational Analysis was used to determine the relationship of teachers' personal variables and their emotional intelligence, and personal variables with the students' academic performance. Salient findings of the study are the following: 1. The biggest number of teachers belong to ages ranging from 36-50 (50.1%) and minimal percentage belong to their mid 20's and 50's and above. By educational attainment, the biggest percentage of teachers (48.1%) have MA units but a very limited number (4%) are Master's degree holders and 2 (3.7%) are undergoing doctoral studies. Most teachers (59%) are under Teacher I category, the entry position and only 2 (3.7%) are Master Teacher I category, the entry position and only 2 (3.7%) are Master Teacher II, the highest teacher category in the school. Most of the teachers have sufficient teaching experience, with 31% above 5 years experience, 24% above 9 years and 29.6% above 19 years. The percentage distribution of teachers as to their performance rating revealed that the group is homogenous, since 80% were rated Very Satisfactory, and only 20% Satisfactory. None revealed an Outstanding or Unsatisfactory rating. 2. The teachers' scores in the Emotional Intelligence Self-Evaluation showed that they have moderately developed emotional intelligence, with self-motivation as the most developed and coaching emotions as the least developed. 3. In the academic performance of students, Mathematics was found to be the students' waterloo and Values Education in the opposite. Students were found to have equal performance in their language subjects. 4. The obtained coefficients of regression analysis showed that emotional intelligence of teachers is not related with the students' academic performance. However, the study showed significant relationship between teaching experience and emotional awareness, age with management of emotions, and self-motivation also with age. 5. The obtained values of r when tested at .05 level of significance showed that the personal variables of teachers are not significantly related to their emotional intelligence. 6. The computed r value of .03 and tabular r value of .25 for emotional intelligence academic performance of students showed a negligible or almost no relationship of these two variables. CONCLUSION: In the light of the findings of the study, the following decisions were arrived at: 1. The null hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between the personal variables of teacher respondents with the academic performance of students is accepted. 2. The null hypothesis that the emotional intelligence of teachers is not related to their personal variables is accepted. 3. The null hypothesis that the emotional intelligence of teacher is not related to the students' academic performance is accepted. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following are the researcher's recommendations: 1. Administrators to look for scholarship grants for teachers an evaluation of the grading system and / or its proper implementation should be made. 2. Start conducting emotional intelligence tests to teachers as bases for in-service trainings to improve the organizational climate of the school. 3. Develop strategies to help slow learners in all subject areas especially in Mathematics. 4. Review the performance appraisal for teacher to determine whether the too truly measures their performance. 5. Encourage encounters/ activities to promote closer teacher-students relationship. 6. Conduct similar study in different settings and / or family background, environment, and student emotional intelligence as other variables.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35329
_d35329