000 06575nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 04574ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 70705
003 0
005 20250921113155.0
008 180122n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aSalanga, Dolores Rotairo.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aComparative effectiveness of the cooperative learning strategy and the traditional method in teaching mathematics II at Manila High School, District V, Manila /
_d
_b
_n
_cDolores Rotairo Salanga.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiv, 96 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2003.;A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in School Principalship.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: The faculty researcher used the Quasi - Experimental Method, which utilized the purposive sampling in the said study. It was participated in by 136 respondents out of (800) second year students from II-4, II-5, II-10 and II-14, out of 20 sections whose grades were 83 and below in the first grading ratings. Pairing or matching of the respondents first grading was done, thus equating the two groups by the first grading finals rating. The two groups constituted the control and the experimental groups, which had 68 respondents. The result obtained were tested at .05 level significance, analyzed, compared, and interpreted utilizing the following statistical tools, descriptive interpretations, arithmetic means, standard deviation and Z-test to test the significance of two groups. However as revealed by the result in the second grading the group treated by the Cooperative Learning Strategy got a higher mean that those taught with the traditional method. A. Objectives: A. General : To determine Comparative Effectiveness of the Cooperative Learning Strategy and the Traditional Method of Teaching Mathematics II, at Manila High School, District V, Manila. Summary of Findings 1. The mean ratings in Mathematics II of the first and second grading periods are: Control Group First Grading Period Mci = 76.88 Second Grading Period, Mcf = 77.32 Experimental Group First Grading Period Mei = 76.60 Second Grading Period, Mef = 79.84 2. The null hypothesis is accepted in the following pair of means: 2.1 Mean of control, initial (Mci) and mean of experimental, initial (Mei) 2.2 Mean of control, initial (Mci) and mean of control, final (Mcf) There is no significant difference between the two means. The alternate hypothesis is accepted in the following pair of means 2.3 Mean of experimental initial, (Mei) and mean of experimental final, (Mef) 2.4 Mean of control, final (Mcf), mean of experimental final, (Mef) There is significant difference between the two means. Based on the findings, the following recommendations are set forth: 1. Since cooperative learning strategy is found to be an effective strategy to enhance the teaching learning competencies of students, the teacher must use it often, especially if the class is heterogeneous. 2. Teachers may use traditional method in the introduction of basic mathematical concepts but use cooperative learning strategy to develop and motivate the students in their learning skills needed in the seatwork or in the computation of problems. 3. Mathematics Club adviser may enhance practical application of cooperative learning by conducting group work in Damath, song interpretations, bingo, trivia and others during mathematics month giving cooperative task incentives to winners on their grades. 4. Cooperative learning strategy to be used when you want learners to be peak performing individuals experiencing success in learning, Basic Education Curriculum (BBC 2002). 5. Teachers must be more creative in using the photo-type lessons provided by the new curriculum. 6. Encourage students to always find a study partner in solving difficult problems. 7. Similar study should be conducted in other schools to compare results with this study and venture on the possibility of using cooperative learning strategy in other subjects.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35334
_d35334