000 07299nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 05290ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 69936
003 0
005 20250921113204.0
008 171229n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aTolentino, Ma. Rebecca Corpuz.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aValidation of a programmed instructional material in Mathematics of investment for students of the Arellano University /
_d
_b
_n
_cMa. Rebecca Corpuz Tolentino.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_aiv, 124 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1996.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Mathematics Education.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: Title: Validation of a Programmed Instructional Material in Mathematics of Investment for Students of the Arellano University The main objective of this study was to validate a programmed instructional material in Mathematics of Investment for the Arellano University freshmen students. Specifically it sought answers to the following questions: 1. Is there a significant gain in the pretest and posttest achievement scores of the students who were: 1.1. exposed to programmed instruction? 1.2. not exposed to programmed instruction? 2. Is there a significant gain in the pretest and posttest mathematics attitude scores of the students who were: 2.1. exposed to programmed instruction? 2.2. not exposed to programmed instruction? 3. Is there a significant difference between the posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in terms of the: 3.1. mathematics achievement 3.2. mathematics attitude This experimental study made used of the pretest-posttest group design. Two sections of Mathematics Investment during the second semester of school year 1994-1995 were the respondents of the study. The first class was assigned as the experimental group and was taught by using the programmed instructional material developed by the researcher. The second group was assigned as the control group and was taught by the Lecture-Discussion method. The researcher administered an achievement test and Mathematics Attitude Scale before the administration of the programmed instructional material. The results of the test were analyzed by using a one-way analysis of variance and analysis of covariance tests. Data were computerized by using the Microstat and SPSS softwares. The statistical test performed on the hypothesis yielded the following results: 1. There was a significant gain in the pretest and posttest achievement scores of the students who were: 1.1. exposed to programmed instruction. 1.2. not exposed to programmed instruction. 2. There was a significant gain in the pretest and posttest mathematics attitude scale of the students who were: 2.1. exposed to programmed instruction. 2.2. not exposed to programmed instruction. 3. There was a significant difference between the posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in terms of the: 3.1. mathematics achievement. 3.2. mathematics attitude. Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Programmed instruction and lecture-discussion method are both effective in increasing the students' achievement in Mathematics of Investment. 2. Programmed instruction and lecture-discussion method can both help students develop a better attitude towards the subject. 3. Programmed instruction is more effective than lecture-discussion method in increasing the students' achievement and in improving their attitude towards the subject. Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are proposed: 1. Workshops on the construction of programmed instructional material should be conducted to train instructors and to provide them with basic knowledge on programming and programmed instruction. 2. Programmed instruction should be used whenever possible to facilitate classroom activities and to give teachers some time for individual follow-up of the students. 3. Programmed instruction should be made familiar and accessible to students in order for teachers or instructors to individualize instruction thus ensuring success in working with individual differences. 4. School administrators should allocate funds to provide financial support for the development of programmed instructional materials. 5. The programmed instructional material developed in this study should be tried out to another group of students to establish the validity of the findings of this study and to further enrich the content and improve the presentation of the modules. 6. The programmed instructional material that was validated in this study should be used by computer scientists in developing Computer Aided Instructions in Mathematics of Investment.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35381
_d35381