000 13114nam a2201237Ia 4500
000 11092ntm a2200217 i 4500
001 74559
003 0
005 20250921113204.0
008 181010n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aCamarao, Deseria Sahagun.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aThe effects of preferred music in enhancing attitude and performance in Physics /
_d
_b
_n
_cDeseria Sahagun Camarao.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axix, 129 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.)-- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2006.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Education, Physical Science.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to determine the effects of preferred music on the attitude and performance in Physics to senior students of Escuela De San Lorenzo Ruiz during the school year 2005-2006. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: This study aimed to determine the Effectiveness of preferred music in enhancing attitude and performance in Physics. Specifically, this study would answer the following questions: 1. Is there a significant difference in the pretest scores of the control group and the experimental group in the achievement test and the attitude test? 2. Is there a significant difference in the posttest scores of the groups of respondents in the achievement test and the attitude test? 3. Is there a significant difference in the pretest and the posttest scores in the achievement test and the attitude test of: 3.1 Control Group 3.2 Experimental Group 4. Is there a significant difference in the gain scores in the achievement test and the attitude test of the two groups of respondents? METHODOLOGY The study was conducted at Escuela De San Lorenzo Ruiz where the researcher is a faculty. To eliminate time and teacher factor all the respondents of the study was handled by the researcher. Fifty two, 4th year high school students enrolled at ESLR from S.Y. 2005-2006 were used as the total population of the study. Data coming from the chemistry grade of these 54 students revealed that there were 17 pairs have the same average grade that can be matched, thus they are comparable as shown in table 3.1 and 3.2. The experimental group listened with their preferred type of music while reviewing for ten minutes before the evaluation while the control group reviewed without music. The different tools that were used in this study were the following: 1. Attitude test in physics, it is an adapted standardized test from the book Research in Education by Joseph Best and James Kahn. It is composed of 20 statements of attitude towards the subject which it has equal number of positive attitude and negative attitude towards the subject. Using Lickert scale each attitude is answered by strongly agree (SA), agree (A), undecided (U), disagree (DA) and strongly disagree (SD). If the statement is positive the following are the corresponding rate (SA) 5, (A) 4, (U) 3, (D) 2, and (SD) 1. If the statement is negative the following are the corresponding rate (SA) 5, (A) 4, (U) 3, (D) 2 and (SD) 1. 2. Achievement test. This an evaluative instrument designed to measure the competencies stated in the instructional objectives and was administered by the researcher to both experimental and control groups at the beginning and at the end of the unit in Mechanics. It is a 50- item constructed by the researcher based on the minimum achievement test included items on measurement, kinematics, force of gravity, projectile motion, laws of motion, mass and weight and law of universal gravitation. A table of specification was prepared by the researcher to guide her in preparing the test items. The achievement test was presented to the experts in physics to ensure content validity. An adapted indicator of a good test was used to validate the constructed achievement test. The researcher sought the help of three teachers teaching the subject from Pasay City South High School to validate the achievement test in terms of the following criteria: test specifications, test format and directions, characteristics of a general test items and characteristics of a multiple choice items. The Likert scale was used to determine the expert's rating on the content of the achievement test based from the indicators. The experimental phase started after the respondents were classified based on their average grade in Chemistry. The pretest was administered on June 29, 2005 to both control and experimental groups. The experimental period is from June 29 to August 16. The experimental and control groups were handled by the researcher during the whole period of the experiment to make sure that all the concepts needed in the study were taught to both groups to eliminate possible effect of teacher factor. The researcher used the lecture-discussion method for both groups in teaching the concepts in mechanics. The teaching aids used were visual aids, chalk, and blackboard. The discussion, formulation of generalizations and valuing were teacher-directed. Fifteen minutes before the time the experimental group took the review while listening with their preferred music, after ten minutes a seatwork was given. The control group do the same except that they do not listen to music during review time. After the lesson for every topic a quiz was given as an evaluation based on the lesson reviewed by the students. The different types of music teenagers preferred to listen to are alternatives, classical, rhythm, and blues, rap, hip-hop, rock, love songs and jazz. These were the types of music they listened to during the review. The different statistical treatment that were used are the following: 1. Two-tailed t-test for independent sample means was used to compute the significant difference between the pretest- pretest and posttest- posttest mean scores of the control and the experimental groups both in achievement test in mechanics and attitude test in physics. 2. Two-tailed t-test for dependent sample means was used to compute the significant difference between the pretest- posttest mean scores of the control and the experimental groups both in achievement test in mechanics and attitude test in physics. 3. One-way ANOVA f-ratio test was used to compute the significant difference in the gain scores in achievement test and attitude test of the two groups of respondents. FINDINGS: The following findings of the study were arrived at: 1. There was no significant difference between the pretest scores of the control group and experimental groups in achievement test. This was showed in the computed t-value which is 0.483 less than the tabular value of 1.960. In similar case also there was no significant difference in the pretest scores of the experimental and the control groups in their attitude test having a computed t-value of 1.43 less than the tabular value which is 1.960. 2. The computed t-value of 0.29 which is less than the tabular value of 1.960, showed that there was no significant difference between the posttest score of the experimental group and the posttest score of the control in achievement test. In similar case there was no significant difference between the posttest scores of the experimental and the control groups in attitude test, based on the computed t-value of 0.021 less than the tabular value of 1.960. 3. The pretest and posttest scores of the control group has significant difference in achievement test based on the computed t - value of 5.560, while there was no significant difference in the attitude test having a computed t- value of 0.34. There was a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores of the experimental group in achievement test with the computed value of 4.193 greater than tabular value of 1.960. The computed t-value in attitude test was 2.17 indicated there was a significant difference. 4. There was significant difference in the gain scores in achievement test of the control and experimental group. This was based on the computed f-ratio value which is 72.0, greater than the tabulated f-value which is 4.16. There was no significant difference in the gain scores in attitude test of the control and experimental groups, as manifested in the computed f-ratio which is 0.46 compared with the tabulated f-value which is 4.16. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the foregoing findings, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. The respondents both in the control group and the experimental group have equal entry of knowledge in mechanics thus; they are equal in terms of mental ability. Both group of respondents have the same outlook and attitude in the study of physics. 2. The use of music during review indicates this could be as effective as non-intervention, though it did not merely answer the it improved the scores in achievement between the control and the experimental groups nevertheless, it helped as a motivation for the experimental group students to stimulate their minds to think, analyze and understand the subject.
520 _aWith regard to the posttest score attitude of the respondents, still they had the feeling of insecurity and uncertainty that they could cope with the pressure and demands of physics. 3. The non-intervention of music during review is still effective method of transmitting knowledge. The attitude of the learners towards the subject matter is still the same-complicated, difficult, and brain dead. Listening with preferred music of the students enhanced their learning in such a way that they were motivated to study and stimulate their mind to think and understand the lessons taken-up. Students appreciated this strategy as manifested in the results of pretest and posttest in achievement of experimental group. The students get excited when it is already review time because of the enjoyment they have while listening to music. Listening with preferred music during review motivated them to understand, analyze and think well the concepts. In terms of their attitude test there was a significant difference in the pretest and posttest scores of the experimental group, moreover, it was negative mean difference. This can be concluded that attitude test score of the learners in pretest was higher than the posttest score. 4. Listening with music during the review time helped the respondents attain a good score, this positively affects the performance in the achievement test. There was no significant difference in the gain scores in attitude test of the control and experimental groups, because the short time given for review and the period of the study would not be enough to determin
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c35385
_d35385