000			08634nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			06987ntm a2200241 i 4500
001			69059
003			0
005			20250920145454.0
008			171105n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aTorres-Taunan, Rosalinda. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aTranslating learning outcomes into school policies and curriculum enrichment / _d _b _n _cRosalinda Torres-Taunan. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _ax, 119 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2007.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aSUMMARY: This is a descriptive study of the performance level of the Grade III-VI pupils in English, Science and Mathematics in the Final Achievement Tests for SY 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 in the Division of City Schools, Manila. The contents of the achievement tests were item analyzed to ascertain the indices of difficulty and to identify the skills least mastered. Results revealed that: The Grade V pupils performed poorly in the three subject areas, SY 2005-2006 as compared to their performance in SY 2004-2005. Science obtained the highest mean average of 30.80 followed closely by Mathematics at 29.54 and English at 29.45, SY 2005-2006. The three subject areas in the four grade levels (Grade III, IV, V, VI) had an average score of 29.30 or MPS of 58.60, way below the 75% criterion level of mastery. In SY 2004-2005, Mathematics obtained the lowest mean, 24.69 while Science got the highest average score in both school years with 30.11 from Grade III-VI and 30.80, Grade III-VI, SY 2005-2006. Although Science was the top performer among the 3 subjects, the MPS was only 60.22 and 61.60 respectively, still below the 75% passing mark set by DepEd. The Grade III examinees performed poorly in Mathematics during the 2 years period (MPS 35.44, SY 2004-2005 and 53.66, SY 2005-2006). English had the most skills least mastered ranging from 68% to 96%. The test in English, Grade III-VI, SY 2004-2005 was moderately difficult but in SY 2005-2006, Grade IV and V were moderately difficult but easy for Grade III and VI. The index of difficulty in Mathematics differed from easy (Grade V and VI) to moderately difficult (Grade IV) to difficult Grade III, SY 2004-2005. In Science, the number of items which reached 75% and above level of mastery ranged from 5 items to 15 items only out of 50-item test. Fifteen items in Science Grade VI, SY 2005-2006 were mastered, 36 items least mastered although some items were nearing mastery. On the basis of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: The Grade V pupils performed poorly in the three subject areas in English Science and Mathematics as compared to their performance in the previous year. In SY 2005-2006, there was an improvement in the performance of the pupils with an average mean or 20.30 or MPS of 58.60 as compared to their previous performance in 2004-2005 with an average mean of 29.89 or MPS of 53.78. In other words, the increment in SY 2005-2006 was 4.82% over the SY 2004-2005. English has the most number of skills least mastered ranging from 68% to 96%. Science obtained the highest mean average in both school years. During the SY 2005-2006, English in Grade VI was considered easy by 74% of the examinees and 64% by the Grade III. The test in English Grade IV seemed to be most difficult among the grades tested in English. Although Science was considered easy as shown in the index of difficulty only 12 items reached the 75% and above criterion level of mastery in Grade IV while in Grade III, 5 items were mastered although 62% of the test was easy. In Mathematics, Grade III SY 2004-2005, not a single item was mastered. Although the test in Mathematics ranged from easy to moderately difficult only few items ranging from 3 - 14 were mastered. A significant number of items were least mastered. In capsule form, the achievement levels of Grade III to VI in English, Science and Mathematics differed from Grade to Grade and from one subject to another. The lowest performance of Grade III was in Mathematics and for Grade IV, V, VI, English. The test items in English, Science and Mathematics for the two school years differed from easy, moderately difficult, and difficult in index number and percent. Based on the conclusions drawn from the findings, of the study and in view of the pupils level of performance which was below the standard set at 75% mean percentage score (MPS) by DepEd, it is recommend that: 1. The poor performance of the pupils could be attributed to too difficult test items. A careful look at the quality of the test is suggested such that the items follow the normal curve. One policy that may be formulated in test construction is to have 1% difficult, 1% very easy and the rest of the items, easy. 2. The mean percentage score set by DepEd at 75% be revisited. 3. The data arrived at, in this study, may be relevant to the Division of City Schools, Manila as baseline data. 4. The identified least mastered skills as reflected in the indices of difficulty should be given priority. This may be the basis for curriculum enrichment in the different subject areas. Teachers with expertise in the three subject areas may be tapped to prepare practice exercises in each of the skills least mastered. 5. Practice exercises prepared be multiplied and distributed to all schools for ready use. 6. In the case of inability to access good books and workbooks, it should be made a policy that each pupil be given a set of textbooks and workbooks. The textbooks to be prepared must include easier or simpler methods of teaching skills least mastered. 7. Another reason for poor performance may be due to big class size. Therefore, it is recommended that a reduction of class size be adopted as a DepEd policy. 8. Division tests should be prepared by experienced and good teachers as well as Master Teachers in Manila's public elementary schools. They may be involved in the preparation of test item banks for the different subject areas during Summer Institute. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c491 _d491