000			13097nam a2201237Ia 4500
000			11483ntm a2200241 i 4500
001			69046
003			0
005			20250920145454.0
008			171105n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aRivera, Evelyn T. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aA comparative analysis of two existing educational programs for street children : _d _bimplications to curriculum development / _n _cEvelyn T. Rivera. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _axix, 131 pages _b
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 1993.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of Graduate School of Arts, Sciences and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education major in Educational Administration. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aABSTRACT: STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The study was undertaken to analyze and compare the two existing educational programs for street children offered by Hiyas Center, Silahis ng Katarungan in Manila and San Juan Nepomuceno School in School Year 1992-1993, to determine the implications for curriculum development. More specifically, the objectives of the researcher in this study are the following: 1. Compare two educational programs for street children in terms of: a. types of program and objectives b. clientele-their characteristics and admission procedures 2. Determine the perceived effects of the following teaching-learning procedures adapted for street children: a. curricular offerings b. staffing/profile of teaching staff c. instructional materials / physical facilities d. methods/strategies used e. extra-curricular/support activities 3. Identify the problems and constraints in implementing the educational program for street children. 4. Determine any significant differences in the past and present academic performance of street children exposed to the said program. HYPOTHESIS: The study tested one null hypothesis: 1. There is no significant difference on the past and present academic performance of street children who were exposed to two educational programs. PROCEDURES: The study utilized the descriptive and ex post facto methods of investigation. Other procedures were informal observations and interviews, giving out of questionnaires and rating scales to be answered by the respondents, gathering and summarizing the results of the standardized tests and the records of the past and present academic performance of the street children and taking pictures for better comparison and analysis of the educational programs for street children. STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA The researcher used the percentage mean to describe how a part relates to the whole. She used it in the description of the respondents in terms of their personal characteristics to draw about a profile. She also used mean scores to interpret the perception of the respondents. Two levels of significance were used; .05 and .01 to indicate significance of responses, a standard deviation was used. To determine any significant difference in past and present status of street children to the two educational programs, the mean scores, standard deviation and t-test were used. FINDINGS: 1. The administrators and teaching staff of the two participating schools had similar perceptions on the objective of educational program for the street children which is to maximize the potentials of the street children to make them self-reliant and productive members of the nation. Hiyas Center (SIKAT) provided the Self Contained/Segregated type of organizational pattern, while that of San Juan Nepomuceno School was Mainstreaming/Integration (Full Integration or Zero Reject Model). The street children were characterized by the participating respondents in Hiyas Center (SIKAT) and San Juan Nepomuceno School according to their location, their source of income and the results of the Otis-Lennon Matrices (Intelligence Test), Bender Gestalt Visual Motor Projective Test and the Rating Scale on Children's Behavior. An additional profile of children in SIKAT reveal child abuse, emotional and behavior problems. Regarding the admission procedures in both participating schools, the DECS Policies and Guidelines for Special Education (1986) were followed. The street children were admitted giving them considerations because of their innate characteristics, family background and present conditions, even though they do not have the necessary school credentials. They were given different tests for proper grade placement. 2. On the perceived effect of teaching-learning procedures adapted for street children, it was found out that in Hiyas Center (SIKAT), curriculum is Effective, staffing, methods and strategies, instructions materials/physical facilities and extra-curricular/support activities, Very Effective. The extra-curricular/support activities ranks first, while curriculum rank last. In San Juan Nepomuceno School, curriculum, staffing, methods/strategies and instructional materials/physical facilities are Effective, while extra-curricular/support activities, Very Effective. In this school, extra-curricular/support activities ranks first, while curriculum rank last. 3. On the problem and constraints in implementing the educational programs for the street children, the respondents of both schools agreed on the following: lack of cooperation of the street children with the school, lack of cooperation of parents with the school and lack of funding. Another problem was included by SIKAT respondents; the rise on cases of child abuse, emotional/behavior problems among the street children. 4. After the comparison of the past and present academic performance of the street children exposed to the two existing educational programs, it was found out that there is significant difference at .01 and .05 level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the foregoing findings on the analysis of the two educational programs for street children offered by Hiyas Center, Silahis ng Katarungan and San Juan Nepomuceno School in School Year 1992-1993, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. There are two types of organizational patterns/ educational programs offered by the two participating schools. In Hiyas Center (SIKAT), the program is Special Class (Self Contained/Segregated), whereby only one type of exceptionality is enrolled in the special class. San Juan Nepomuceno School provides Full Integration or zero reject model. The street children are mainstreamed with the normal children in a regular classroom. They are together in academic and non-academic subjects. Both participating schools have objectives to maximize the street children's potentials by developing proper values and wholesome personality as preparation for being self-reliant and productive members of the country. The two schools characterized the street children according to their location, source of income and results of Otis-Lennon Intelligence Test, Bender Gestalt Visual-Motor Projective Test and Rating Scale on Children's Behavior. Additional profile of the clientele of Hiyas Center (SIKAT) classifies some of its clientele as raped, sexually molested, physically maltreated, rejected, prostitutes, chemical substance users and emotionally disturbed. As regards admission procedures, the two participating schools follow DECS guidelines but give considerations on age limit and other factors because they are children with special needs. Once admitted in the school, the clientele are screened and tested for proper grade placement. 2. The two schools vary in the perception of the effects of teaching-learning procedures like staffing, methods/strategies used and instructional materials/physical facilities but they have same results in line with extra-curricular activities and curriculum, which is Very Effective. In SIKAT, staffing, methods/strategies, instructional materials/physical facilities are Very Effective, while in San Juan Nepomuceno School these learning procedures were perceived Effective. 3. Both participating schools had problems regarding cooperation of street children and parents with the school and funding to improve the services. Silahis ng Katarungan had additional problem on the rise of incidents on child abuse thereby creating more emotional and behavior problems among some of its clientele. 4. There is significant difference in the past and present academic performance / status of the street children in Hiyas Center (SIKAT) and San Juan Nepomuceno School. RECOMMENDATIONS: In the light of the conclusions made, the following recommendations are offered. 1. In Silahis ng Katarungan, social workers must be detailed for regular and effective follow up of the street children in and out of the school and other related functions. San Juan Nepomuceno School must have a guidance counselor or psychologist to do the guidance and counseling functions, diagnosis, evaluation and follow up of street children. Record keeping is a must. In both schools, case management should be a part of the evaluation program.
520			_a 2. The members of the staff of San Juan Nepomuceno School should have academic background in Special Education for the improvement of the teaching-learning procedures. Those who will handle the street children should attend seminars, workshops and in-service trainings at national, division, district or school level to attain professional growth. 3. In Hiyas Center, Silahis ng Katarungan, extra-curricular activities should include religious instruction and value development. An evaluation of these activities should be enforced. 4. In both schools, orientation programs, home visits, letter sending to parents, invitation to meetings and follow-ups in and out of the school should be done. 5. The proposed program (Appendix D) for street children should be subjected to validation processes involving school administrators, teachers and parents.] 6. Special facilities/instructional materials-instructional materials and learning vehicles which facilitates and stimulate the teaching-learning processes to make the street children fully recognize their potentialities should be provided in the school's budget. Funding sources should be tapped from civic, religious and non-government organizations. 7. Parent Education should be an integral part of the special education program for street children. Parents shall be given opportunities to share and give feedbacks for evaluation and improvement of the program. 8. Researches relevant to the evaluation of street children shall be conducted to provide bases for the improvement of instructions at all levels. Suggested topics for subsequent researches are: a. Income-Generating Activities _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c493 _d493