000			10296nam a2201225Ia 4500
000			08651ntm a2200241 i 4500
001			47691
003			0
005			20250920145456.0
008			141122n 000 0 eng d
010			_z _z _o _a _b
015			_22 _a
016			_2 _2 _a _z
020			_e _e _a _b _z _c _q _x
022			_y _y _l _a2
024			_2 _2 _d _c _a _q
028			_a _a _b
029			_a _a _b
032			_a _a _b
035			_a _a _b _z _c _q
037			_n _n _c _a _b
040			_e _erda _a _d _b _c
041			_e _e _a _b _g _h _r
043			_a _a _b
045			_b _b _a
050			_a _a _d _b2 _c0
051			_c _c _a _b
055			_a _a _b
060			_a _a _b
070			_a _a _b
072			_2 _2 _d _a _x
082			_a _a _d _b2 _c
084			_2 _2 _a
086			_2 _2 _a
090			_a _a _m _b _q
092			_f _f _a _b
096			_a _a _b
097			_a _a _b
100			_e _e _aJimenez, Zenaida Aguirre. _d _b4 _u _c0 _q16
110			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c _k
111			_a _a _d _b _n _c
130			_s _s _a _p _f _l _k
210			_a _a _b
222			_a _a _b
240			_s _s _a _m _g _n _f _l _o _p _k
245		0	_a _aManagement of culture and arts programs : _d _bbasis for developing and concretizing cultural indicators / _n _cZenaida Aguirre Jimenez. _h6 _p
246			_a _a _b _n _i _f6 _p
249			_i _i _a
250			_6 _6 _a _b
260			_e _e _a _b _f _c _g
264			_3 _3 _a _d _b _c46
300			_e _e _c28 cm. _a284 pages : _billustration
310			_a _a _b
321			_a _a _b
336			_b _atext _2rdacontent
337			_3 _30 _b _aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_3 _30 _b _avolume _2rdacarrier
340			_2 _20 _g _n
344			_2 _2 _a0 _b
347			_2 _2 _a0
362			_a _a _b
385			_m _m _a2
410			_t _t _b _a _v
440			_p _p _a _x _v
490			_a _a _x _v
500			_a _aThesis (Ph.D.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2010.;A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Management, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Public Management. _d _b _c56
504			_a _a _x
505			_a _a _b _t _g _r
506			_a _a5
510			_a _a _x
520			_b _b _c _aTo achieve the purpose of the study, a total of 293 respondents representing three groups: higher educational institutions-based arts groups, government cultural agencies; and pool of experts who are respected in the field of culture and arts were purposely sampled. To supplement the data yielded by the survey questionnaire, documentary analysis of relevant NCCA and other cultural agencies files was also done. Significant findings of this study were used as a basis in developing and concretizing a number of cultural indicators. 7. Statement of the Problem The study attempts to examine the management of implementation of priority policies and the six major program thrusts of the NCCA contained in the MTPDP 2004-2010 Chapter 20 on culture. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following questions: 7.1 As assessed by the respondents, to what extent have the following programs been implemented by the Commission: 7.1.1 Culture and Development; 7.1.2 Program of Artistic Excellence 7.1.3 Promotion of Culture and Arts 7.1.4 Conservation of Cultural Heritage 7.1.5 Culture and Diplomacy; and 7.1.6 Culture and Peace? 7.2 How significant is the difference in assessments of the three groups of respondents to the extent of implementation of the aforementioned programs? 7.3 To what extent the Commission has applied the principles of good governance in the implementation for its priority policies contained in the MTPDP 2004-2010? 7.4 How does the Commission maintain linkages between and among agencies inn pursuit of cultural development? 7.5 What are the problems encountered in the implementation of policies and programs? 7.6 What solutions can be offered to address the problems encountered in the implementation of the policies and programs of the Commission? 7.7 What cultural indicators can be derived from the six programs that could measure policy and program implementation success or failure? 8. Research Design Descriptive method of research was used and undertaken through a survey questionnaire. Documentary analysis was also undertaken. 9. Treatment of Data Statistical tools were used to analyze and interpret the data included percentage, means, weighted means, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The F-Test of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at .05 level of significance was used to compare the assessments of the 3 groups of respondents. 10. Summary of findings 1. Extent of implementation of the six major programs The extent of implementation of the six programs is varied, to wit: The Program for Artistic Excellence and Conservation of Cultural Heritage Program are assessed as great extent. On the other hand, the four programs, namely: Culture and Development Program, Promotion of Culture and Arts, Culture and Diplomacy and Culture and Peace manifest a response of moderate extent. 2. Results of testing the hypothesis There is no significant difference in the assessments of the three groups of respondents on the 5 major programs of the NCCA. The 2 groups of respondents, i.e., the higher education institutions-based arts organizations and cultural workers of government cultural agencies did not significantly differ in their assessment in all of the six programs. However, the group of experts significantly differs with the other two groups in the Culture and Peace Program. Hence, in this study the hypothesis to the effect that there is no significant difference in the assessments of the three groups of respondents on the extent of implementation of the 6 programs was confirmed/accepted is true for only 5 programs but not for the Culture and Peace Program. 3. Application of the imperatives of good governance in the implementation of priority policies The extent of application of good governance in the implementation of priority policies contained in the MTPDP 2004-2010 manifest a response of moderate extent. 4. Extent of linkages of NCCA between and among key partners and other agencies The extent of linkages of NCCA between and other agencies is assessed to be moderate, however variable H-1: supports arts and culture projects of LGUs arts council, arts groups, higher education institutions and other culture agencies in terms of funding and technical assistance got great extent response. 5. Problems encountered in implementation Responses to problems encountered in implementation is generally assessed as partly agree. 6. Solutions offered to address the identified problems The responses of the three groups of respondents to the solutions offered to address the identified problems is agree. Conclusions In the light of the findings of the study, the following are drawn: 1. The implementation of the policies and the six major programs from the three respondent groups is claimed to be implemented moderately if not, to a great extent 2. The LGU personnel of Manila and Quezon City are not actively involved in the implementation of culture and arts programs 3. The HEIs and government cultural agencies did not significantly differ in their assessments of the Culture and Peace Program, however the group of experts significantly differs in their assessment of the Culture and Peace Program. 11. Recommendations 1. LGUs Manila and Quezon City need to strengthen its involvement and participation in cultural programs and projects. 2. The NCCA must consistently pursue continuing and sustained efforts in generating data towards formulation of additional cultural indicators. 3. The NEDA Project Monitoring Staff must provide formal trainings particularly on results monitoring and evaluation (RME). 4. Implementers of cultural agencies and arts groups must have formal training and substantial work experience to command respect and hence, competency to implement all aspects of the program. 5. Persons involved in the implementation of cultural programs must maintain a high standard of ethical behavior to ensure fair and equitable delivery of services. 6. The bi-monthly newsletter of the NCCA, AGUNG needs reformatting to basically contain only pertinent culture and arts information. 7. The internal audit service should regularly monitor the continuing and sustained application of the imperatives of good governance: accountability, transparency, participation, sustainability, efficiency and effectiveness. responsiveness, and leadership in policy and program implementation. 8. The NCCA as lead agency for culture and arts must further intensify efficiently and effectively the implementation of the six programs to achieve maximum impact. 9. For further studies, cultural indicators the would measure the contributions of culture and arts, particularly creative industries to the national economy is strongly suggested to future researchers. 10. NCCA to strictly stress and regularly monitor the application of good governance through the Project Monitoring and Evaluation Division and for the Planning and Policy Office to undertake continuing data gathering. 11. Similarly, research on indicators of good governance should be pursued by future researchers to further improve the effectiveness of policy and program implementation. _u
521			_a _a _b
533			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c
540			_c _c _a5
542			_g _g _f
546			_a _a _b
583			_5 _5 _k _c _a _b
590			_a _a _b
600			_b _b _v _t _c2 _q _a _x0 _z _d _y
610			_b _b _v _t2 _x _a _k0 _p _z _d6 _y
611			_a _a _d _n2 _c0 _v
630			_x _x _a _d _p20 _v
648			_2 _2 _a
650			_x _x _a _d _b _z _y20 _v
651			_x _x _a _y20 _v _z
655			_0 _0 _a _y2 _z
700			_i _i _t _c _b _s1 _q _f _k40 _p _d _e _a _l _n6
710			_b _b _t _c _e _f _k40 _p _d5 _l _n6 _a
711			_a _a _d _b _n _t _c
730			_s _s _a _d _n _p _f _l _k
740			_e _e _a _d _b _n _c6
753			_c _c _a
767			_t _t _w
770			_t _t _w _x
773			_a _a _d _g _m _t _b _v _i _p
775			_t _t _w _x
776			_s _s _a _d _b _z _i _t _x _h _c _w
780			_x _x _a _g _t _w
785			_t _t _w _a _x
787			_x _x _d _g _i _t _w
800			_a _a _d _l _f _t0 _q _v
810			_a _a _b _f _t _q _v
830			_x _x _a _p _n _l0 _v
942			_a _alcc _cBK
999			_c498 _d498