000 07620nam a2201225Ia 4500
000 05933ntm a2200241 i 4500
001 70819
003 0
005 20250920145500.0
008 180130n 000 0 eng d
010 _z
_z
_o
_a
_b
015 _22
_a
016 _2
_2
_a
_z
020 _e
_e
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
_x
022 _y
_y
_l
_a2
024 _2
_2
_d
_c
_a
_q
028 _a
_a
_b
029 _a
_a
_b
032 _a
_a
_b
035 _a
_a
_b
_z
_c
_q
037 _n
_n
_c
_a
_b
040 _e
_erda
_a
_d
_b
_c
041 _e
_e
_a
_b
_g
_h
_r
043 _a
_a
_b
045 _b
_b
_a
050 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c0
051 _c
_c
_a
_b
055 _a
_a
_b
060 _a
_a
_b
070 _a
_a
_b
072 _2
_2
_d
_a
_x
082 _a
_a
_d
_b2
_c
084 _2
_2
_a
086 _2
_2
_a
090 _a
_a
_m
_b
_q
092 _f
_f
_a
_b
096 _a
_a
_b
097 _a
_a
_b
100 _e
_e
_aLuciano, Emelyn Creus.
_d
_b4
_u
_c0
_q16
110 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
_k
111 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
130 _s
_s
_a
_p
_f
_l
_k
210 _a
_a
_b
222 _a
_a
_b
240 _s
_s
_a
_m
_g
_n
_f
_l
_o
_p
_k
245 0 _a
_aLife experiences influencing self-handicapping behavior :
_d
_bbasis for an improved counseling program /
_n
_cEmelyn Creus Luciano.
_h6
_p
246 _a
_a
_b
_n
_i
_f6
_p
249 _i
_i
_a
250 _6
_6
_a
_b
260 _e
_e
_a
_b
_f
_c
_g
264 _3
_3
_a
_d
_b
_c46
300 _e
_e
_c28 cm.
_axiv, 73 pages
_b
310 _a
_a
_b
321 _a
_a
_b
336 _b
_atext
_2rdacontent
337 _3
_30
_b
_aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _3
_30
_b
_avolume
_2rdacarrier
340 _2
_20
_g
_n
344 _2
_2
_a0
_b
347 _2
_2
_a0
362 _a
_a
_b
385 _m
_m
_a2
410 _t
_t
_b
_a
_v
440 _p
_p
_a
_x
_v
490 _a
_a
_x
_v
500 _a
_aThesis (M.A.) -- Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2009.;A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts, Sciences, and Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Industrial Psychology major in Clinical Psychology.
_d
_b
_c56
504 _a
_a
_x
505 _a
_a
_b
_t
_g
_r
506 _a
_a5
510 _a
_a
_x
520 _b
_b
_c
_aABSTRACT: This quasi-experimental research is undertaken to determine the effects of counseling to suspected self-handicappers and to document the influence of life experiences in self-handicapping behaviors of the students in the City College of Tagaytay. Specifically, this study seeks to articulate on and answer the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the experimental and control group in terms of the following: a. Age; b. Gender; c. Religion; d. Socio-Economic Status? 2. What is the mean grade point average and mean I.Q. of the respondents when grouped according to the: a. Control Group and b. Experimental Group? 3. What is the mean pre-test and post-test self-handicapping scores of the respondents based on the PALS test when grouped according to: a. Control and b. Experimental? 4. Is there a significant difference between the self handicapping scores based on the following combinations: a. Pre-test and Pre-test scores of the control group and experimental group b. Post-test and Post-test scores of the control group and experimental group c. Between the pre-test and post-test of the control group d. Between the pre-test and post-test of the experimental group? The findings if the study are as follows: 1. The profile of the respondents under the control and the experimental groups in terms of age ranges between 16 to 28 years old. The sample is composed of 25 females and 15 males; 29 of them are members of the Roman Catholic and one is from Iglesia ni Cristo. In terms of civil status; 37 of them are single while 3 are married. Regarding the respondents' socio-economic status both in the Control and Experimental Groups: 11 0f them belong to class B, 19 fall in class C and 10 of them belong to class D. 2. The mean of the respondents' GPA under the control group is 87.9% and the I.Q. is 63.25 points on the scale of 140-item test, while the mean of the respondents' GPA under the experimental group is 80.2% and I.Q. is 66.75 points, respectively. This finding interprets into a difference of 7.7 greater GPA recorded with the Control Group while the Experimental Group posted an average of 3.50 higher IQ points. 3. The mean performance of the control group in the PALS Pre-test is 2.9 which is less than the experimental group at 4.3. Meanwhile, the post-test mean performance of the control group is 2.53 which is greater than the experimental group at 2.25. 4. The combination of pre-test vs. pre-test between the control and experimental group and the pre-test and post within the experimental group yielded a significant difference while the other combinations did not produce any significant difference. The findings of the study led to the following conclusions: 1. The control and experimental groups' Pre-test results have no significant difference at 0.05 level of significance. This is evidenced by the computed t-value of 1.51013 which is less than the tabulated t-value of 1.729. 2. The control group and experimental group Post-test have a significant difference at 0.05 level of significance. This attested that counseling had a quantifiable effect on the respondents. 3. The Pre-test and Post-test results of control group has no significant difference at 0.05 level of significance. 4. The Pre-test and Post-test of experimental group have a significant difference at 0.05 level of significance. This implies that the intervention of counseling is significant to the students under experimental group who underwent counseling. Based on the findings and conclusion, the following recommendations were formulated: 1. Results of this study are only a speck of the correlation of a lot more still unidentified variables. Further investigations are necessary to examine self-handicapping behavior as a real and valid phenomenon in young adults. 2. A standardized set of instruments must be formulated and administered to the widest possible population by future researchers to validate the results of this study. 3. Self-realization and Self-awareness can be an effective intervention towards self-handicapping behavior. 4. Guidance counselors should give attention and time for those students who are manifesting self-handicapping behavior so that they can be an instrument of minimizing if not totally eliminating these cases. 5. Guidance Counselors should possibly implement the proposed guidance program for self-handicapping behavior to minimize if not totally eliminate this case.
_u
521 _a
_a
_b
533 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c
540 _c
_c
_a5
542 _g
_g
_f
546 _a
_a
_b
583 _5
_5
_k
_c
_a
_b
590 _a
_a
_b
600 _b
_b
_v
_t
_c2
_q
_a
_x0
_z
_d
_y
610 _b
_b
_v
_t2
_x
_a
_k0
_p
_z
_d6
_y
611 _a
_a
_d
_n2
_c0
_v
630 _x
_x
_a
_d
_p20
_v
648 _2
_2
_a
650 _x
_x
_a
_d
_b
_z
_y20
_v
651 _x
_x
_a
_y20
_v
_z
655 _0
_0
_a
_y2
_z
700 _i
_i
_t
_c
_b
_s1
_q
_f
_k40
_p
_d
_e
_a
_l
_n6
710 _b
_b
_t
_c
_e
_f
_k40
_p
_d5
_l
_n6
_a
711 _a
_a
_d
_b
_n
_t
_c
730 _s
_s
_a
_d
_n
_p
_f
_l
_k
740 _e
_e
_a
_d
_b
_n
_c6
753 _c
_c
_a
767 _t
_t
_w
770 _t
_t
_w
_x
773 _a
_a
_d
_g
_m
_t
_b
_v
_i
_p
775 _t
_t
_w
_x
776 _s
_s
_a
_d
_b
_z
_i
_t
_x
_h
_c
_w
780 _x
_x
_a
_g
_t
_w
785 _t
_t
_w
_a
_x
787 _x
_x
_d
_g
_i
_t
_w
800 _a
_a
_d
_l
_f
_t0
_q
_v
810 _a
_a
_b
_f
_t
_q
_v
830 _x
_x
_a
_p
_n
_l0
_v
942 _a
_alcc
_cBK
999 _c511
_d511