| 000 | 01769nam a2200265Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 64373 | ||
| 003 | per1691 | ||
| 005 | 20251009102038.0 | ||
| 008 | 170322n r p 0 0eng d | ||
| 015 | _22 | ||
| 041 | _aengtag | ||
| 050 | _a. | ||
| 082 | _a. | ||
| 100 | _a Mark Joseph T. Calano | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aDerrida and the Death of God | |
| 264 |
_aQuezon City _bAteneo De Manila University, _c2014 |
||
| 336 |
_btext _atext _2text |
||
| 337 |
_bunmediated _aunmediated _2unmediated |
||
| 338 |
_bvolume _avolume _2volume |
||
| 505 | _aABSTRACT : Jacques Derrida’s understanding of the death of God is rooted in but goes beyond Nietzsche’s and Hegel’s understanding of the concept. On the one hand, Nietzsche’s view of the death of God is related to two concepts: a closing horizon (which is the death of God) and an emerging horizon (which is the eternal recurrence); on the other hand, Hegel understands the death of God asthe Absolute’s confrontation with its negation (death), and Aufhebung (the negation of negation). While Derrida’s notion of the death of God cannot be reduced simply to either a Nietzschean or Hegelian interpretation, it drawsheavily from Nietzsche’s eternal recurrence and Hegel’s Aufhebung. This paper discusses how, for Derrida, a simple denial or negation of God is never accomplished because it leaves behind an evacuated and empty space, which opens up the possibility for a more complicated notion of the death of God.This complicated death of God consists in an undecidable play between life/death understood correctly in relation to différance and the trace, to mourning and sacrifice. | ||
| 526 | _aF | ||
| 650 | _aDerrida -- Death of God | ||
| 655 | _aphilosophy and humanities | ||
| 942 |
_alcc _cSL _2lcc |
||
| 999 |
_c5131 _d5131 |
||